Re: Does this string processing work for you?

Dave: Intel Compiler for Windows, V9.x works.
That is output from compiling your program previously posted
is: 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Skip

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:28:06 GMT, "David Frank" <dave_frank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

-|
-|"Herman D. Knoble" <SkipKnobleLESS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
-|news:tifij19egmbgf1jdhjg7le57t2b3j3c8ci@xxxxxxxxxx
-|> Dave: For your info.
-|>
-|> Windows: Works with Salford FTN95, Lahey LF95
-|>
-|> Windows: Many lines of garbage output from G95.
-|>
-|> Lnux: Works with Intel ifort, Lahey lf95
-|>
-|
-|re:
-| read (s,*,err=1) (v(n),n=1,size(v))
-|
-|So I assume you didnt test Windows Intel ifort?
-|Else if it doesnt, CVF migration using this needed OVERLOOKED feature is
-|broken.
-|
-|Now that I have shown my rebuttal code in comp.lang.pl1 using this syntax,
-|a identical code has been posted, so apparently IBM GOT IT RIGHT with PL/I
-|aka Fortran-V as far back as 1965.
-|
-|To me its a NO-BRAINER to dictate to vendors they must exit do loop with
-|their current index count intact..
-|and it doesnt break any existing valid programming either..
-|
-|I wonder how many other languages (and NON-fly-by-nite, Fortran compilers)
-|also GET IT RIGHT!!
-|

.