Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- From: Dan Nagle <dannagle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:17:31 GMT
David Frank wrote:
<snip>
No it shud be 8 for same reason that the standard dictates that a do loop shall exit +1 to its do terminus count when run to completion and lots of code depends on that behaviour, this just repeats that KNOWN behaviour
But if a program exits from a loop prematurely, the loop index is the last value obtaining within the loop. Surely, that's the behavior you're trying to emulate. Unless you want to consider a premature end condition to be expected?
"We all have to go sometime... " ;-)
<snip>
-- Cheers!
Dan Nagle Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc. .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- From: David Frank
- Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- References:
- Does this string processing work for you?
- From: David Frank
- Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- From: Herman D . Knoble
- Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- From: David Frank
- Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- From: David Frank
- Does this string processing work for you?
- Prev by Date: Re: Intel Fortran license?
- Next by Date: Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- Previous by thread: Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- Next by thread: Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- Index(es):