Re: Does this string processing work for you?


"David Frank" <dave_frank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jx6%e.6043$vw6.3157@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Actually its NOT a case of asking for additional processing to return a
> index,
> its just asking compiler writers to keep their COTTON-PICKING HANDS OFF
> the existing index when a error is detected.
>

Just trying to be amusing,
I accept that it IS a case of asking for additional processing to return a
index..
However, beyond the EASY processing of unknown items from a file record
advantage,
(compare with the multitude of statements everyone is using now to process a
file record)
the valid index would allow the exact error item to be reported and even
allow resuming string processing in the error handler.



.

Quantcast