Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- From: Ron Shepard <ron-shepard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:28:07 -0500
In article <iG6%e.3123$U51.295@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
robin <robin_v@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It isn't a question of "keeping ... hands off".
> When code sich as this is optimised, the control variable
> may be kept in a register, rather than in storage.
> When the loop terminates unexpectedly, the contents
> of the register are lost, and the value of the
> variable in storage is not changed.
Also, what is kept in that control register is probably not the
fortran integer index, it is more likely a byte-oriented address
that is incremented by the size of the items that are read.
$.02 -Ron Shepard
.
- References:
- Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- From: robin
- Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- Prev by Date: Re: Request for C2F.ZIP
- Next by Date: Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
- Previous by thread: Re: Does this string processing work for you?
- Next by thread: Fortran and .NET (C#)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|