Re: Arrays of zero length
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard E Maine)
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:46:32 -0700
Jan Vorbrüggen <jvorbrueggen-not@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It's good to know about the association issue as I actually
> > use the associated intrinsic some in my code. I'm not sure if they are
> > actually used with the vectors that are zero-length or not, but I'll
> > make sure to check next week.
>
> I would assume that the issue that Richard mentioned has to do with using
> the ASSOCIATED intrinsic with two arguments, not the case where it has only
> one argument.
Correct. Or in different terms, from a viewpoint of functionality rather
than syntax, there is no "funniness" about whether or not it is
associated, but you are likely to be surprised on the question of what
it is associated with.
--
Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience;
email: my first.last at org.domain| experience comes from bad judgment.
org: nasa, domain: gov | -- Mark Twain
.
- References:
- Re: Arrays of zero length
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Arrays of zero length
- From: gh14tq5@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Arrays of zero length
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: Arrays of zero length
- Prev by Date: Re: printing internal values of intervals
- Next by Date: Re: MPI Parallel version of a FIFO queue?
- Previous by thread: Re: Arrays of zero length
- Next by thread: My Homework: how to calculate natural log, e?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading