IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)

IMPLICIT NONE should finally be made default beginning at F2k8. Compiler switches can be specified to get the older behavior. There is absolutely no good reason to continue this way.
--

Gary Scott
mailto:garyscott@xxxxxxx

Fortran Library:  http://www.fortranlib.com

Support the Original G95 Project:  http://www.g95.org
-OR-
Support the GNU GFortran Project:  http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html

Why are there two?  God only knows.


If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows it can't be done.

-- Henry Ford
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
    ... Gary L. Scott wrote: ... > IMPLICIT NONE should finally be made default beginning at F2k8. ... > Compiler switches can be specified to get the older behavior. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
    ... > IMPLICIT NONE should finally be made default beginning at F2k8. ... > Compiler switches can be specified to get the older behavior. ... But isn't it already as of f90? ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
    ... Gary L. Scott wrote in message... ... >IMPLICIT NONE should finally be made default beginning at F2k8. ... >Compiler switches can be specified to get the older behavior. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
    ... Compiler switches can be specified to get the older behavior. ... There is absolutely no good reason to continue this way. ... you could always try to set the default options for your copy of your compiler to use the "assume implicit none" option that all respectable compilers offer. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: placement of implicit none
    ... I seem to recall reconstructing a reason that ... Implicit statements in general can depend on other names, ... musings and viewpoint, of course. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)