Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)

In article <11lnu2hqd5deb50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Gary L. Scott <garyscott@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>But it doesn't even effect anybody in any significant negative way, just
>add a compiler switch on compilation, get the old behavior (if they must)...

So the people building Fortran packages who don't understand either
Fortran or the Makefile scheme can phone you up for free consulting,
right?

I think IMPLICIT NONE is a great feature, and I use it on all the code
I write. But there's a reason why compilers don't default to having it
on already.

-- greg

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
    ... Greg Lindahl wrote: ... add a compiler switch on compilation, get the old behavior... ... So the people building Fortran packages who don't understand either ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Uninitialized variables
    ... > In a discussion on whether or not to allow a compiler switch to set ... > unintialized variables to zero on the old CVF forum, ... > eems reals and integers have a default initialization of the largest ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: porting from solaris/sparc to linux/intel
    ... The usual and standard way to specify double precision is to write it ... question that you are probably using a compiler switch on the Sun to ... But if you do want to use a compiler switch ... That probably forces you to choose between fixing ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: settting /CLR per file in VS 2005
    ... > I was told that it is possible to set the /clr compiler switch on a ... > per file basis. ... > have a class that has managed members setting the /clr on a per file ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vc)
  • Using shared library within VS .NET 2003
    ... also had to add the preprocessor definition "EXPORTING_pso." ... 2003 compiler can't find the implementation of this function. ... I supposed to fix this error? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.soft-sys.matlab)