Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
- From: "robin" <robin_v@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:11:52 GMT
Edward N Bromhead wrote in message ...
>
>Plenty of code has been written, and plenty of good work
>done, using implicit typing. Those of us who like implicit typing find that
>we can instantly recognize the type of a variable from its initial letter,
>provided that explicit typing has not been turned on.
You can still enjoy the initial letter convention by declaring
variables with initial letters consistent with that convention.
>Eddie Bromhead
.
- References:
- IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
- From: Gary L. Scott
- Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
- From: Edward N Bromhead
- IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
- Prev by Date: Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
- Next by Date: Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
- Previous by thread: Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
- Next by thread: Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
- Index(es):