Re: Suggestions on mimicing fgetc and fseek with F90
- From: "James Giles" <jamesgiles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:11:42 GMT
Clive Page wrote:
> In message <djr5hc$cra$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven G. Kargl
> <kargl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
>> Perhaps, Richard noticed that the OP specifically requested a
>> "standard F90 I/O to do this".
>>
> Well maybe that's the explanation. Of course there really isn't
> such a thing, as F90 didn't support it. [...]
Well, all of the functionality of *formatted* streams was
already supported in F90. The F2003 formatted stream
feature adds nothing to the capability of the Fortran
language.
--
J. Giles
"I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software
design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously
no deficiencies and the other way is to make it so complicated
that there are no obvious deficiencies." -- C. A. R. Hoare
.
- References:
- Suggestions on mimicing fgetc and fseek with F90
- From: m sutton
- Re: Suggestions on mimicing fgetc and fseek with F90
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Suggestions on mimicing fgetc and fseek with F90
- From: Clive Page
- Re: Suggestions on mimicing fgetc and fseek with F90
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: Suggestions on mimicing fgetc and fseek with F90
- From: Clive Page
- Suggestions on mimicing fgetc and fseek with F90
- Prev by Date: Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
- Next by Date: Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
- Previous by thread: Re: Suggestions on mimicing fgetc and fseek with F90
- Next by thread: Re: Suggestions on mimicing fgetc and fseek with F90
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|