comp.lang.fortran

• Date Index

---

• FFTW and ESSL Fourier Transform, FX
  • Re: FFTW and ESSL Fourier Transform, James Van Buskirk
• Good book on fortran 90/95, n o s p a m p l e a s e
  • Re: Good book on fortran 90/95, richard . koolhans
  • Re: Good book on fortran 90/95, Walt Brainerd
• tape i/o, rtre
  • Re: tape i/o, Michael Metcalf
  • Re: tape i/o, Richard E Maine
  • Re: tape i/o, robert . corbett
• F90 derived type component as array, kus
  • Re: F90 derived type component as array, Jugoslav Dujic
• (OOT)Numerical methods in geophysics, bowo
• RatFor, bowo
  • Re: RatFor, Gib Bogle
  • Re: RatFor, Tim Prince
  • Re: RatFor, Gordon Sande
    • Re: RatFor, Tim Prince
• printing logical variables as "true" and "false", beliavsky
  • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Richard E Maine
    • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Richard E Maine
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Richard E Maine
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", James Van Buskirk
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Nestor Grion
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Richard Maine
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Nestor Grion
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Richard E Maine
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Ron Shepard
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", David Flower
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", [JvO]
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Nestor Grion
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Paul Van Delst
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", James Van Buskirk
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Andy Mai
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", James Van Buskirk
      • Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false", Ron Shepard
• Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, NN
  • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Vincent
    • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Tim Prince
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Greg Lindahl
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Greg Lindahl
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Mark Mackey
    • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Catherine Rees Lay
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Vincent
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Catherine Rees Lay
  • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, FCC
    • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, FCC
    • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, FCC
    • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, FCC
    • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, FCC
    • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, FCC
  • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Lynn McGuire
    • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Paul Van Delst
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Lynn McGuire
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Mr Hrundi V Bakshi
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Lynn McGuire
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Mark Hadfield
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Greg Lindahl
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Rich Townsend
  • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, NN
    • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, NN
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Mr Hrundi V Bakshi
    • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?, Gary L. Scott
• Fortran pages on Wikipedia, Vincent
• How to use REWIND COMMAND of FORTRAN77 in FORTRAN 90, vinnie
  • Re: How to use REWIND COMMAND of FORTRAN77 in FORTRAN 90, David Flower
    • Re: How to use REWIND COMMAND of FORTRAN77 in FORTRAN 90, Richard E Maine
  • Re: How to use REWIND COMMAND of FORTRAN77 in FORTRAN 90, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: How to use REWIND COMMAND of FORTRAN77 in FORTRAN 90, jon
• Polynomial fitting routines?, Steven G. Kargl
  • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, Herman D . Knoble
    • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, FX
      • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, Nestor Grion
      • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, Charles Russell
      • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, Janne Blomqvist
      • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, Gordon Sande
  • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, Charles Russell
  • Re: Polynomial fitting routines?, Gib Bogle
• Why pgf90 can not recognize some intrinsic function when compiling?, Leo.Aries.G@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why pgf90 can not recognize some intrinsic function when compiling?, Tim Prince
    • Re: Why pgf90 can not recognize some intrinsic function when compiling?, Leo.Aries.G@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why pgf90 can not recognize some intrinsic function when compiling?, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: Why pgf90 can not recognize some intrinsic function when compiling?, Dan Nagle
• Executing Fortran Code One Line at a Time, Matt
  • Re: Executing Fortran Code One Line at a Time, Jim
    • Re: Executing Fortran Code One Line at a Time, Jim
      • Re: Executing Fortran Code One Line at a Time, Matt
• how can I know if two pointers are equal??, Millena
  • Re: how can I know if two pointers are equal??, Jugoslav Dujic
  • Re: how can I know if two pointers are equal??, robin
• writing at the end of the lines, Kamaraju Kusumanchi
  • Re: writing at the end of the lines, Richard Maine
    • Re: writing at the end of the lines, Kamaraju Kusumanchi
      • Re: writing at the end of the lines, Richard Maine
      • Re: writing at the end of the lines, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: writing at the end of the lines, Janne Blomqvist
      • Re: writing at the end of the lines, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: writing at the end of the lines, Janne Blomqvist
      • Re: writing at the end of the lines, Surendar Jeyadev
      • Re: "USE MATLAB" writing at the end of the lines, kis
      • Re: "USE MATLAB" writing at the end of the lines, Kamaraju Kusumanchi
      • Re: "USE MATLAB" writing at the end of the lines, Michael Prager
  • Re: writing at the end of the lines, Ron Shepard
  • Re: writing at the end of the lines, Ian Bush
• F200x status?, Joe Krahn
  • Re: F200x status?, Rich Townsend
  • Re: F200x status?, Tim Prince
  • Re: F200x status?, Dan Nagle
    • Re: F200x status?, [JvO]
      • Re: F200x status?, Dan Nagle
  • Re: F200x status?, Richard Maine
• Fortran binding to C++ libraries, Joe Krahn
  • Re: Fortran binding to C++ libraries, Pierre Asselin
    • Re: Fortran binding to C++ libraries, Joe Krahn
• array, srilanka
  • Re: array, Jerry DeLisle
    • Re: array, Duane Bozarth
  • Re: array, Richard Maine
• Namelist correctness question, Jerry DeLisle
  • Re: Namelist correctness question, Richard Maine
    • Re: Namelist correctness question, Jerry DeLisle
  • Re: Namelist correctness question, Ron Shepard
    • Re: Namelist correctness question, Jerry DeLisle
    • Re: Namelist correctness question, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Namelist correctness question, Ron Shepard
      • Re: Namelist correctness question, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Namelist correctness question, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Namelist correctness question, Jerry DeLisle
• help needed with Sun f77 format, analyst41
  • Re: help needed with Sun f77 format, Dan Nagle
    • Re: help needed with Sun f77 format, Richard E Maine
  • Re: help needed with Sun f77 format, Paul Van Delst
    • Re: help needed with Sun f77 format, Dan Nagle
    • Re: help needed with Sun f77 format, analyst41
      • Message not available
      • Re: help needed with Sun f77 format, analyst41
      • Re: help needed with Sun f77 format, Dan Nagle
      • Re: help needed with Sun f77 format, analyst41
      • Re: help needed with Sun f77 format, Catherine Rees Lay
  • Re: help needed with Sun f77 format, robert . corbett
    • Re: help needed with Sun f77 format, analyst41
• Problem that goes away when I turn debug on, Dave Taylor
  • Pretty good debugger, Al Worth
  • Re: Problem that goes away when I turn debug on, Johan
  • Re: Problem that goes away when I turn debug on, Dick Hendrickson
  • Re: Problem that goes away when I turn debug on, robin
• Some formatting problems, BornAgainFortraner
  • Re: Some formatting problems, Dan Nagle
  • Re: Some formatting problems, Gordon Sande
  • Re: Some formatting problems, BornAgainFortraner
    • Re: Some formatting problems, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: Some formatting problems, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: Some formatting problems, Joost
    • Re: Some formatting problems, BornAgainFortraner
      • Re: Some formatting problems, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: Some formatting problems, BornAgainFortraner
      • Re: Some formatting problems, Dick Russell
      • Re: Some formatting problems, Dick Russell
      • Re: Some formatting problems, BornAgainFortraner
      • Re: Some formatting problems, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Some formatting problems, John Harper
      • ADVANCE='NO' and X format? Was Re: Some formatting problems, John Harper
      • Re: ADVANCE='NO' and X format? Was Re: Some formatting problems, Steven G. Kargl
  • Re: Some formatting problems, robin
  • Re: Some formatting problems, Catherine Rees Lay
    • Re: Some formatting problems, Gordon Sande
• default initialisation, Joost
  • Re: default initialisation, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: default initialisation, Joost
  • Re: default initialisation, Helge Avlesen
    • Re: default initialisation, Joost
  • Re: default initialisation, Jugoslav Dujic
    • Re: default initialisation, Dan Nagle
      • Re: default initialisation, Rich Townsend
      • Re: default initialisation, Joost
      • Re: default initialisation, Rich Townsend
      • Re: default initialisation, Helge Avlesen
      • Re: default initialisation, Jugoslav Dujic
      • Re: default initialisation, Dan Nagle
      • Re: default initialisation, Joost
  • Re: default initialisation, Richard E Maine
  • Re: default initialisation, Colin Watters
• programming GUIs, Mario Ospelt
  • Re: programming GUIs, Gary L. Scott
  • Re: programming GUIs, Ken Plotkin
    • Re: programming GUIs, Hani Andreas Ibrahim
      • Re: programming GUIs, Lawson Wakefield
      • Re: programming GUIs, Richard E Maine
      • Re: programming GUIs, Dan Nagle
      • Re: programming GUIs, Ken Plotkin
      • Re: programming GUIs, Richard Maine
      • Re: programming GUIs, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: programming GUIs, Charles Russell
      • Re: programming GUIs, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: programming GUIs, Richard Maine
      • Re: programming GUIs, Richard Maine
      • Re: programming GUIs, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: programming GUIs, Ron Shepard
      • Re: programming GUIs, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: programming GUIs, Ron Shepard
      • Re: programming GUIs, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: programming GUIs, Helge Avlesen
      • Re: programming GUIs, Steven G. Kargl
      • Gfortran status (was: Re: programming GUIs), ejko123
      • Re: Gfortran status, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: Gfortran status (was: Re: programming GUIs), Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: Gfortran status, Charles Russell
      • Re: Gfortran status, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: Gfortran status, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: programming GUIs, Gary L. Scott
    • Re: programming GUIs, David Ham
      • Re: programming GUIs, Gib Bogle
      • Re: programming GUIs, Gib Bogle
      • Re: programming GUIs, Robert Baer
      • Re: programming GUIs, Ken Plotkin
      • Re: programming GUIs, David Ham
      • Re: programming GUIs, Richard Maine
      • Re: programming GUIs, David Ham
      • Re: programming GUIs, Ken Plotkin
  • Re: programming GUIs, Joe Krahn
    • Re: programming GUIs, Arjen Markus
      • Re: programming GUIs, Janne Blomqvist
      • Re: programming GUIs, Arjen Markus
      • Re: programming GUIs, vin
      • Re: programming GUIs, Dan Nagle
      • Re: programming GUIs, Arjen Markus
      • Re: programming GUIs, vin
      • Re: programming GUIs, Arjen Markus
  • Re: programming GUIs, e p chandler
  • Re: programming GUIs, Jugoslav Dujic
    • Re: programming GUIs, Mario Ospelt
  • Re: programming GUIs, Helge Avlesen
    • Re: programming GUIs, Mario Ospelt
      • Re: programming GUIs, Helge Avlesen
  • Re: programming GUIs, vincent.magnin
  • RE: programming GUIs, meek
  • Re: programming GUIs, kia
    • Re: programming GUIs, Vincent
      • Re: programming GUIs, Jugoslav Dujic
• Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?, ferrad
  • RE: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?, meek
    • Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?, David Ham
      • Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?, Louis Krupp
      • Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?, N. Shamsundar
    • Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?, ferrad
      • Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?, ferrad
• [Fortran 77] A library for fetching a web page through HTTP ?, Thomas Baruchel
• associated pointer on 0 size vector, Umberto D'Ortona
  • Re: associated pointer on 0 size vector, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: associated pointer on 0 size vector, Richard E Maine
      • Re: associated pointer on 0 size vector, Umberto D'Ortona
      • Message not available
      • Re: associated pointer on 0 size vector, Richard Maine
      • Message not available
      • Re: associated pointer on 0 size vector, Dick Hendrickson
• FYI: "Fortran replaced by C" -- USDO Energy, N. Shamsundar
• Pointers versus Allocatables, Joe Krahn
  • Re: Pointers versus Allocatables, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: Pointers versus Allocatables, Richard Maine
      • Re: Pointers versus Allocatables, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Pointers versus Allocatables, Jon Harrop
      • Re: Pointers versus Allocatables, Greg Lindahl
  • Re: Pointers versus Allocatables, apm
    • Re: Pointers versus Allocatables, Richard E Maine
    • Re: Pointers versus Allocatables, Michael Metcalf
      • Re: Pointers versus Allocatables, Joe Krahn
    • Re: Pointers versus Allocatables, Greg Lindahl
      • Re: Pointers versus Allocatables, glen herrmannsfeldt
• Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Aleramo
  • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Michael Wild
    • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Aleramo
      • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Michael Wild
      • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Greg Lindahl
      • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Michael Wild
      • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, David Ham
      • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, awgreynolds
  • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Joe Krahn
    • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Gary L. Scott
  • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Greg Lindahl
    • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Aleramo
      • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, David Ham
      • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, David Ham
      • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Michael Prager
      • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Jon Harrop
  • Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C, Jon Harrop
• MPIF90, Rich Townsend
  • Re: MPIF90, Dan Nagle
  • Re: MPIF90, Greg Lindahl
• [g77/95] How to link libraries statically on Linux, Hani Andreas Ibrahim
  • Re: How to link libraries statically on Linux, Arjen Markus
    • Re: How to link libraries statically on Linux, Hani Andreas Ibrahim
      • Re: How to link libraries statically on Linux, Rich Townsend
  • Re: [g77/95] How to link libraries statically on Linux, Tim Prince
  • Re: [g77/95] How to link libraries statically on Linux, wob96
• deleting an element from the linked list, Millena
  • Re: deleting an element from the linked list, Joost
  • Re: deleting an element from the linked list, Michael Metcalf
• problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc, antonioparodi74
  • Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc, Michael Wild
    • Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc, Tim Prince
      • Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc, Greg Lindahl
    • Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc, Steve Lionel
      • Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc, Michael Wild
  • Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc, Reinhold Bader
    • Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc, Michael Wild
• Ten Commandments (On Topic!), David Flower
  • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Gordon Sande
    • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Dan Nagle
    • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Ken Plotkin
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), David Flower
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Gordon Sande
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Rich Townsend
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Richard Maine
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Gordon Sande
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Ken Plotkin
  • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), [JvO]
    • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), David Flower
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), [JvO]
    • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), [JvO]
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Michael Metcalf
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), [JvO]
  • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Ron Shepard
  • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), phaccount
    • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Rich Townsend
    • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Catherine Rees Lay
  • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Kevin G. Rhoads
  • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), David Flower
    • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Charles Russell
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Ken Plotkin
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Mr Hrundi V Bakshi
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Ken Plotkin
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Dan Nagle
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Gordon Sande
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Greg Lindahl
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Ken Plotkin
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Greg Lindahl
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Ken Plotkin
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Rich Townsend
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Dan Nagle
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Tim Prince
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Gordon Sande
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), FCC
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Dan Nagle
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), FCC
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Dan Nagle
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Gordon Sande
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Dan Nagle
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Gary L. Scott
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Richard E Maine
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), FCC
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Richard E Maine
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Pierre Asselin
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Ron Shepard
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Catherine Rees Lay
      • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!), Charles Russell
• help for Library, TC
  • Re: help for Library, Arjen Markus
  • Re: help for Library, Catherine Rees Lay
• about c to fortran, wakun
  • Re: about c to fortran, Dan Nagle
    • Re: about c to fortran, beliavsky
      • Re: about c to fortran, Dan Nagle
    • Re: about c to fortran, Greg Lindahl
      • Re: about c to fortran, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: about c to fortran, Greg Lindahl
      • Re: about c to fortran, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: about c to fortran, Greg Lindahl
    • Re: about c to fortran, wakun
  • Re: about c to fortran, Ron Shepard
    • Re: about c to fortran, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: about c to fortran, Dan Nagle
  • Re: about c to fortran, kia
    • Re: about c to fortran, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: about c to fortran, robin
    • Re: about c to fortran, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: about c to fortran, Dan Nagle
• Random number (object) problem. One solution?, Nestor Grion
• linking acml library with salford ftn compiler, acp693
  • Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler, Max
    • Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler, acp693
  • Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler, N. Shamsundar
    • Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler, acp693
      • Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler, N. Shamsundar
      • Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler, acp693
• Important: is Alpha, TC
  • Re: Important: is Alpha, Duane Bozarth
  • Re: Important: is Alpha, N. Shamsundar
    • Re: Important: is Alpha, Dan Nagle
    • Re: Important: is Alpha, Ken Fairfield
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, James Van Buskirk
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, N. Shamsundar
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, Nestor Grion
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, Ken Fairfield
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, Louis Krupp
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, Ken Fairfield
  • Re: Important: is Alpha, James Giles
  • Re: Important: is Alpha, robin
    • Re: Important: is Alpha, Ken Fairfield
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, N. Shamsundar
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, James Van Buskirk
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, Nestor Grion
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, N. Shamsundar
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, robin
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, Louis Krupp
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, robin
      • Re: Important: is Alpha, Nestor Grion
• LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Tom
  • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), robert . corbett
    • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Tom
  • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Victor Eijkhout
    • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Ron Shepard
      • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Tim Prince
    • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Tom
      • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Jan Vorbrüggen
    • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Tom
      • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Richard E Maine
      • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Tom
      • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Richard E Maine
      • Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?), Victor Eijkhout
• what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Lynn McGuire
  • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Rich Townsend
  • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, James Giles
    • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Max
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Max
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Jon Harrop
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Joe Krahn
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Walter Spector
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Max
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Max
    • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Jon Harrop
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, James Giles
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Jon Harrop
  • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Richard E Maine
    • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Lynn McGuire
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Rich Townsend
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Lynn
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Richard Maine
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Lynn
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Richard Maine
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Lynn
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Steve Lionel
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Lynn McGuire
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Steve Lionel
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Lynn McGuire
  • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, David Flower
  • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, Joe Krahn
    • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?, David Ham
• BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Steven G. Kargl
  • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, James Giles
  • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Richard E Maine
    • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Richard Maine
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Ken Fairfield
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Ron Shepard
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Richard Maine
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Richard Maine
  • Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?, Michael Metcalf
• gfortran and graphical windows ?, vincent.magnin
  • Re: gfortran and graphical windows ?, Hani Andreas Ibrahim
    • Re: gfortran and graphical windows ?, vin
• Fortran derived type and C struct passing character, Brian McKenna
  • Re: Fortran derived type and C struct passing character, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Fortran derived type and C struct passing character, Walter Spector
  • Re: Fortran derived type and C struct passing character, David Frank
• derived type for dates, beliavsky
  • Re: derived type for dates, Arjen Markus
• [newbie] the problem of declaring a function in the interface, Jurang
  • Re: [newbie] the problem of declaring a function in the interface, Dan Nagle
    • Re: the problem of declaring a function in the interface, Jurang
      • Re: the problem of declaring a function in the interface, Dan Nagle
      • Re: the problem of declaring a function in the interface, Richard E Maine
      • Re: the problem of declaring a function in the interface, Jurang
      • Re: the problem of declaring a function in the interface, Richard E Maine
    • Re: [newbie] the problem of declaring a function in the interface, Ian Bush
• not able to use implicit none, Kamaraju Kusumanchi
  • Re: not able to use implicit none, Jonas Stein
  • Re: not able to use implicit none, Dan Nagle
    • Re: not able to use implicit none, Kamaraju Kusumanchi
      • Re: not able to use implicit none, Richard Maine
      • Re: not able to use implicit none, richard . koolhans
      • Re: not able to use implicit none, Kamaraju Kusumanchi
      • Re: not able to use implicit none, Janne Blomqvist
• G95 Trace Back?, Herman D . Knoble
  • Re: G95 Trace Back?, Helge Avlesen
    • Re: G95 Trace Back?, Herman D . Knoble
      • Re: G95 Trace Back?, Helge Avlesen
  • Re: G95 Trace Back?, Andy Vaught
    • Re: G95 Trace Back?, Sjouke Burry
    • Re: G95 Trace Back?, Herman D . Knoble
• USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler, Lucian Anton
  • Re: USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler, Les
    • Re: USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler, Les
  • Re: USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler, Michael Metcalf
  • Re: USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler, Herman D . Knoble
  • Re: USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler, Greg Lindahl
• Derived type name as a dummy argument - possible?, David
  • Re: Derived type name as a dummy argument - possible?, Dan Nagle
    • Re: Derived type name as a dummy argument - possible?, James Giles
    • Re: Derived type name as a dummy argument - possible?, David Ham
  • Re: Derived type name as a dummy argument - possible?, James Van Buskirk
• Group Deterioration, Gary L. Scott
  • Re: Group Deterioration, Dan Nagle
    • Re: Group Deterioration, Rich Townsend
    • Re: Group Deterioration, Brooks Moses
      • Re: Group Deterioration, Richard Maine
      • Re: Group Deterioration, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Group Deterioration, Richard E Maine
      • RE: Group Deterioration, meek
      • Re: Group Deterioration, Andy Spragg
      • Re: Group Deterioration, Ken Plotkin
      • Re: Group Deterioration, Kevin G. Rhoads
      • Re: Group Deterioration, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Group Deterioration, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Group Deterioration, Surendar Jeyadev
• Intel VF 9 work with Visual Studio 2005?, Al Worth
  • Re: Intel VF 9 work with Visual Studio 2005?, Lynn McGuire
    • Re: Intel VF 9 work with Visual Studio 2005?, Al Worth
      • Re: Intel VF 9 work with Visual Studio 2005?, Richard E Maine
    • Re: Intel VF 9 work with Visual Studio 2005?, Haje Korth
• SVD, Divide and Conquer, LAPACK, DGELSD problem, CheJJ
  • Re: SVD, Divide and Conquer, LAPACK, DGELSD problem, N. Shamsundar
  • Re: SVD, Divide and Conquer, LAPACK, DGELSD problem, Hanyou Chu
    • Re: SVD, Divide and Conquer, LAPACK, DGELSD problem, Damien
• Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, Andreas Ernst
  • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, N. Shamsundar
    • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, Andreas Ernst
      • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, Mark Westwood
      • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, Andreas Ernst
      • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, Ira Baxter
  • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code (OT), Michael Metcalf
  • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, N. Shamsundar
    • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, Andreas Ernst
      • Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code, Jugoslav Dujic
• write a main program into a subroutine, PCAT
  • Re: write a main program into a subroutine, Duane Bozarth
  • Re: write a main program into a subroutine, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: write a main program into a subroutine, PCAT
      • Re: write a main program into a subroutine, Michael Metcalf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • write a main program into a subroutine, PCAT
• Re: random_number, robin
  • Re: random_number, Rich Townsend
    • Re: random_number, robin
      • Re: random_number, Rich Townsend
      • Re: random_number, robin
  • Re: random_number, Dr Ivan D. Reid
    • Re: random_number, Gordon Sande
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: random_number, robin
    • Re: random_number, Rich Townsend
      • Re: random_number, robin
      • Re: random_number, James Giles
      • Re: random_number, robin
      • Re: random_number, Rich Townsend
    • Re: random_number, Rich Townsend
      • Re: random_number, Rich Townsend
      • Re: random_number, robin
      • Re: random_number, Rich Townsend
      • Re: random_number, robin
      • Re: random_number, robin
      • Re: random_number, James Giles
      • Re: random_number, robin
      • Re: random_number, Rich Townsend
      • Re: random_number, Dr Ivan D. Reid
      • Re: random_number, robin
      • Re: random_number, glen herrmannsfeldt
• [ANN] Data Plotting Library DISLIN 9.0, Helmut Michels
• MERGE in recursive function, John Harper
  • Re: MERGE in recursive function, Richard E Maine
    • Re: MERGE in recursive function, James Van Buskirk
    • Re: MERGE in recursive function, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: MERGE in recursive function, James Giles
    • Re: MERGE in recursive function, Richard Maine
  • Re: MERGE in recursive function, robin
• X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?, wob96
  • Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?, Richard Maine
    • Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?, Dr Ivan D. Reid
      • Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?, wob96
      • Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?, Dr Ivan D. Reid
      • Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?, wob96
    • Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?, wob96
  • Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?, Steve Lionel
    • Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?, S7Solutions
• Converting unformatted data, Thomas Koenig
  • Re: Converting unformatted data, Richard E Maine
    • Re: Converting unformatted data, robert . corbett
      • Re: Converting unformatted data, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: Converting unformatted data, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: Converting unformatted data, Richard E Maine
  • Re: Converting unformatted data, Helge Avlesen
  • Re: Converting unformatted data, Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: How to download gfortran?, elizabeth . l . yip
  • Message not available
    • Re: How to download gfortran?, elizabeth . l . yip
  • Re: How to download gfortran?, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: How to download gfortran?, elizabeth . l . yip
• WRITE + new line, Martin Glaser
  • Re: WRITE + new line, Dan Nagle
    • Re: WRITE + new line, Martin Glaser
      • Re: WRITE + new line, Richard E Maine
      • Re: WRITE + new line, James Van Buskirk
      • Re: WRITE + new line, Dan Nagle
  • Re: WRITE + new line, Michael Prager
  • Re: WRITE + new line, robin
    • Re: WRITE + new line, Dan Nagle
      • Re: WRITE + new line, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: WRITE + new line, Dan Nagle
      • Re: WRITE + new line, Richard E Maine
      • Re: WRITE + new line, Dan Nagle
      • Re: WRITE + new line, Richard E Maine
      • Re: WRITE + new line, James Giles
      • Re: WRITE + new line, Dan Nagle
      • Re: WRITE + new line, robin
      • Re: WRITE + new line, Dan Nagle
      • Re: WRITE + new line, robin
    • Re: WRITE + new line, Rich Townsend
      • Re: WRITE + new line, robin
      • Re: WRITE + new line, Dan Nagle
      • Re: WRITE + new line, Rich Townsend
      • Re: WRITE + new line, robin
• minloc with .false. mask, David Ham
  • Re: minloc with .false. mask, Rich Townsend
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: minloc with .false. mask, Brooks Moses
      • Re: minloc with .false. mask, [JvO]
      • Re: minloc with .false. mask, Les
      • Re: minloc with .false. mask, Brooks Moses
• module mt95, gpiroux
  • Re: module mt95, Pierre Asselin
    • Re: module mt95, gpiroux
• "Floating point decode error", Random Programmer
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: "Floating point decode error", Richard Maine
      • Re: "Floating point decode error", Random Programmer
      • Re: "Floating point decode error", Richard E Maine
  • Re: "Floating point decode error", robin
• indirect recursion in f90/95, Stefano Baroni
  • Re: indirect recursion in f90/95, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: indirect recursion in f90/95, Stefano Baroni
      • Re: indirect recursion in f90/95, Richard Maine
      • Re: indirect recursion in f90/95, Jugoslav Dujic
      • Re: indirect recursion in f90/95, Ian Bush
  • Re: indirect recursion in f90/95, [JvO]
  • Re: indirect recursion in f90/95, Richard Maine
    • Re: indirect recursion in f90/95, James Van Buskirk
  • Re: indirect recursion in f90/95, robin
    • Re: indirect recursion in f90/95, Rich Townsend
    • Re: indirect recursion in f90/95, Dan Nagle
• Help with one linking problem, PCAT
  • Message not available
    • Re: Help with one linking problem, PCAT
• DNUM and JNUM fonctions, Franck LERAY
  • Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions, Duane Bozarth
  • Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions, Rich Townsend
    • Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions, Rich Townsend
      • Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions, Franck LERAY
      • Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions, Franck LERAY
  • Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions, Jim
• call by value/reference conundrum (C<->Fortran), phaccount
  • Re: call by value/reference conundrum (C<->Fortran), Jim
  • Re: call by value/reference conundrum (C<->Fortran), Ken Fairfield
  • Re: call by value/reference conundrum (C<->Fortran), Pierre Asselin
• Fortran BOF (Birds of a Feather) session at Supercomputing '05, Steve Lionel
  • Re: Fortran BOF (Birds of a Feather) session at Supercomputing '05, David Frank
    • Message not available
      • Re: Fortran BOF (Birds of a Feather) session at Supercomputing '05, David Frank
• Invalid forward reference, Toby White
  • Re: Invalid forward reference, Richard Maine
    • Re: Invalid forward reference, Ian Bush
    • Re: Invalid forward reference, Toby White
• First-chance exception in ****.exe: 0xC0000091: Float Overflow, Anita
  • Re: First-chance exception in ****.exe: 0xC0000091: Float Overflow, Jugoslav Dujic
    • Re: First-chance exception in ****.exe: 0xC0000091: Float Overflow, Anita
• COCO and/ior CPP users?, Joe Krahn
  • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Rich Townsend
    • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Joe Krahn
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Greg Lindahl
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Rich Townsend
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, David Frank
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Greg Lindahl
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Greg Lindahl
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Rich Townsend
  • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Tim Prince
    • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, robert . corbett
    • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Greg Lindahl
  • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Joe Krahn
    • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Gordon Sande
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Rich Townsend
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, David Ham
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Rich Townsend
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, David Ham
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Greg Lindahl
  • Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?, Walter Spector
• MS Fortran 5, Doug H.
  • Re: MS Fortran 5, Sjouke Burry
  • Re: MS Fortran 5, Kevin G. Rhoads
    • Re: MS Fortran 5, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: MS Fortran 5, Duane Bozarth
      • RE: MS Fortran 5, meek
      • Re: MS Fortran 5, John Doe
      • Re: MS Fortran 5, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: MS Fortran 5, Kevin G. Rhoads
• fortran 90/95 standart, Patrick Begou
  • Re: fortran 90/95 standard, [JvO]
  • Re: fortran 90/95 standart, Arjen Markus
  • Re: fortran 90/95 standart, James Van Buskirk
    • Re: fortran 90/95 standart, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: fortran 90/95 standart, James Van Buskirk
    • Re: fortran 90/95 standart, Herman D . Knoble
      • Re: fortran 90/95 standart, James Van Buskirk
    • Re: fortran 90/95 standart, James Giles
  • Re: fortran 90/95 standart, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: fortran 90/95 standart, Patrick Begou
      • Re: fortran 90/95 standart, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: fortran 90/95 standart, Patrick Begou
• Question about user-defined operators, Arjen Markus
• writing to binary, rawlins02
  • Re: writing to binary, [JvO]
    • Re: writing to binary, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: writing to binary, [JvO]
      • Re: writing to binary, Richard E Maine
  • Re: writing to binary, [JvO]
  • Re: writing to binary, Richard E Maine
    • Re: writing to binary, rawlins02
      • Re: writing to binary, rawlins02
      • Re: writing to binary, Richard Maine
      • Re: writing to binary, rawlins02
    • Re: writing to binary, glen herrmannsfeldt
• Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, J. Jennings
  • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, Duane Bozarth
    • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, Duane Bozarth
    • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, James Giles
  • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, L. Johansen
    • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, Richard E Maine
  • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, Jim
    • RE: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, meek
      • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, David Frank
      • RE: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, meek
      • Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77, glen herrmannsfeldt
• Array procedure arguments with undefined elements, Rich Townsend
  • Re: Array procedure arguments with undefined elements, Richard E Maine
• TRIM., Claudenê Correia
  • Re: TRIM., Richard E Maine
  • Re: TRIM., David Ham
  • Re: TRIM., Ken Plotkin
    • Re: TRIM., Richard Maine
      • Re: TRIM., Ken Plotkin
  • Re: TRIM., robin
    • Re: TRIM., Rich Townsend
      • Re: TRIM., robin
      • Re: TRIM., James Giles
      • Re: TRIM., robin
      • Re: TRIM., Rich Townsend
      • Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM), kia
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM), tholen
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM), kia
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM), James Giles
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM), James Giles
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM), robin
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM), Ken Plotkin
      • re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, Ken Plotkin
      • Re: TRIM, Catherine Rees Lay
      • Re: TRIM, Ken Plotkin
      • Re: TRIM, Catherine Rees Lay
      • Re: TRIM, Ken Plotkin
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM), tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, Robert Baer
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, robin
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, James Giles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, Ken Plotkin
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, James Giles
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, Richard Maine
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: Robin Vowels nonsense, David Frank
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, kia
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, kia
      • Re: Townsent's nonsense, Rich Townsend
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, Dan Nagle
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, Dan Nagle
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, Dan Nagle
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, Dan Nagle
      • Re: TRIM., robin
      • Re: TRIM., Ken Plotkin
      • Re: TRIM., Rich Townsend
      • Re: TRIM., robin
      • Re: TRIM., Duane Bozarth
      • Re: TRIM., David Frank
      • Re: TRIM., Rich Townsend
      • Re: TRIM., Gary L. Scott
      • Re: TRIM., James Giles
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, James Giles
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, Rich Townsend
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, Rich Townsend
      • Re: TRIM, Nestor
      • Re: TRIM, Nestor
      • Re: TRIM, James Giles
      • Re: TRIM, Nestor
      • Re: TRIM, James Giles
      • Re: TRIM, analyst41
      • Re: TRIM, analyst41
      • Re: TRIM, Dan Nagle
      • Re: TRIM, Richard E Maine
      • Re: TRIM, James Giles
      • Re: TRIM, N. Shamsundar
      • Re: TRIM, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: TRIM, Ron Shepard
      • Re: TRIM, James Giles
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, James Giles
      • Re: TRIM, Dan Nagle
      • Re: TRIM, Rich Townsend
      • Re: TRIM, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: TRIM, James Giles
      • Re: TRIM, [JvO]
      • Re: TRIM, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: TRIM, James Giles
      • Re: TRIM, James Giles
      • Message not available
      • Re: TRIM, Ken Plotkin
    • Re: TRIM., [JvO]
      • Re: TRIM., Rich Townsend
      • Re: TRIM., James Van Buskirk
      • Re: TRIM., Jugoslav Dujic
      • Re: TRIM., James Van Buskirk
      • Re: TRIM., Jugoslav Dujic
      • Challenge! [was Re: TRIM], Rich Townsend
      • Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM], David Frank
      • Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM], David Frank
      • Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM], Rich Townsend
      • Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM], mcalhoun
      • Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM], Rich Townsend
      • Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM], Jugoslav Dujic
      • Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM], Rich Townsend
      • Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM], James Giles
      • Re: TRIM, robin
      • Re: TRIM, Walter Spector
• Installing ATLAS and LAPACK, Darren L. Weber
  • Re: Installing ATLAS and LAPACK, Rich Townsend
    • Re: Installing ATLAS and LAPACK, Darren L. Weber
• Easy way to find out which module variables take up a lot of memory?, Stig Kildegård Andersen
• Re: Formatted output, overwrite, [JvO]
  • Re: Formatted output, overwrite, Jason Nielsen
    • Re: Formatted output, overwrite, [JvO]
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Formatted output, overwrite, robert . corbett
    • Re: Formatted output, overwrite, Louis Krupp
  • Re: Formatted output, overwrite, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Formatted output, overwrite, andrea campera
    • Re: Formatted output, overwrite, [JvO]
      • Re: Formatted output, overwrite, Andrea Campera
      • Re: Formatted output, overwrite, Jason Nielsen
  • Re: Formatted output, overwrite, robin
• DATA statement in g77, laurel
  • Re: DATA statement in g77, David Flower
    • Re: DATA statement in g77, Richard E Maine
  • Re: DATA statement in g77, Richard E Maine
• FortranCompiler and IMSL, aa_surf
  • Re: FortranCompiler and IMSL, Duane Bozarth
    • Re: FortranCompiler and IMSL, aa_surf
• A StepWise Regression Subroutine, Wang Jun
  • Re: A StepWise Regression Subroutine, Arjen Markus
  • Re: A StepWise Regression Subroutine, beliavsky
    • Re: A StepWise Regression Subroutine, Wang Jun
• Re: Give me link on this fotran problem, Arjen Markus
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Give me link on this fotran problem, N. Shamsundar
  • Re: Give me link on this fotran problem, Gib Bogle
  • Re: Give me link on this fotran problem, [JvO]
  • Re: Give me link on this fotran problem, Rich Townsend
• Text wrapping in output under Intel compiler, Dave Taylor
  • Re: Text wrapping in output under Intel compiler, [JvO]
    • Re: Text wrapping in output under Intel compiler, Dave Taylor
      • Message not available
      • Re: Text wrapping in output under Intel compiler, Dave Taylor
      • Re: Text wrapping in output under Intel compiler, Arjen Markus
      • Re: Text wrapping in output under Intel compiler, Dave Taylor
      • Re: Text wrapping in output under Intel compiler, Michael Prager
      • Re: Text wrapping in output under Intel compiler, Steve Lionel
      • Re: Text wrapping in output under Intel compiler, Richard E Maine
• Decoding real variables expressed as binary, ralphpdas
  • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, N. Shamsundar
    • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, robert . corbett
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, N. Shamsundar
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, robert . corbett
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, robin
  • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, [JvO]
  • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, Kevin G. Rhoads
    • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, Kevin G. Rhoads
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, Walter Spector
    • Desktop Cyber (was: Decoding real variables expressed as binary), Richard Maine
      • Re: Desktop Cyber (was: Decoding real variables expressed as binary), Walter Spector
      • Re: Desktop Cyber, Richard Maine
      • Re: Desktop Cyber, Walter Spector
      • Re: Desktop Cyber, bv
    • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, [JvO]
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, Kevin G. Rhoads
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, Kevin G. Rhoads
      • Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary, glen herrmannsfeldt
• changing argument types for four functions, Lynn McGuire
  • Re: changing argument types for four functions, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: changing argument types for four functions, Lynn McGuire
    • Re: changing argument types for four functions, Lynn McGuire
      • Re: changing argument types for four functions, Steve Lionel
  • Re: changing argument types for four functions, N. Shamsundar
  • Re: changing argument types for four functions, Jugoslav Dujic
    • Re: changing argument types for four functions, Lynn McGuire
      • Re: changing argument types for four functions, James Van Buskirk
• Intel Visual Fortran 9.0 MINLOC problem (sort of), barrios
  • Re: Intel Visual Fortran 9.0 MINLOC problem (sort of), Greg Lindahl
    • Re: Intel Visual Fortran 9.0 MINLOC problem (sort of), barrios
• Calling C function from Fortran, Feng
  • Re: Calling C function from Fortran, [JvO]
    • Re: Calling C function from Fortran, Jugoslav Dujic
• should i write keywords uppercase?, Jonas Stein
  • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Gordon Sande
  • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Dick Russell
    • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, gary . l . scott
    • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, David Flower
      • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Paul Van Delst
      • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Brooks Moses
  • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Rich Townsend
  • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Tom Micevski
  • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Paul Van Delst
    • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Dick Hendrickson
      • Message not available
      • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Richard E Maine
  • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, David Flower
  • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Richard E Maine
  • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Ken Fairfield
  • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, mcalhoun
  • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Jonas Stein
      • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: should i write keywords uppercase?