comp.lang.fortran

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Mr Hrundi V Bakshi
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: tape i/o
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Mark Hadfield
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Andy Mai
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Nestor Grion
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: FFTW and ESSL Fourier Transform
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Good book on fortran 90/95
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: tape i/o
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: FX
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Mark Mackey
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: NN
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Good book on fortran 90/95
  • From: richard . koolhans
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: NN
• Re: tape i/o
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• FFTW and ESSL Fourier Transform
  • From: FX
• Good book on fortran 90/95
  • From: n o s p a m p l e a s e
• Re: "USE MATLAB" writing at the end of the lines
  • From: Michael Prager
• tape i/o
  • From: rtre
• Re: RatFor
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: "USE MATLAB" writing at the end of the lines
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: RatFor
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: analyst41
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Nestor Grion
• Re: F90 derived type component as array
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• F90 derived type component as array
  • From: kus
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: FCC
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: FCC
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: FCC
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: FCC
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Vincent
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: David Flower
• Re: "USE MATLAB" writing at the end of the lines
  • From: kis
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: RatFor
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: RatFor
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Mr Hrundi V Bakshi
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• (OOT)Numerical methods in geophysics
  • From: bowo
• RatFor
  • From: bowo
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Nestor Grion
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Nestor Grion
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: FCC
• printing logical variables as "true" and "false"
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: FCC
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: writing at the end of the lines
  • From: Surendar Jeyadev
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: FCC
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: How to use REWIND COMMAND of FORTRAN77 in FORTRAN 90
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: Vincent
• Re: How to use REWIND COMMAND of FORTRAN77 in FORTRAN 90
  • From: jon
• Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
  • From: NN
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Vincent
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: FCC
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Fortran pages on Wikipedia
  • From: Vincent
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: FCC
• Re: How to use REWIND COMMAND of FORTRAN77 in FORTRAN 90
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: How to use REWIND COMMAND of FORTRAN77 in FORTRAN 90
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• How to use REWIND COMMAND of FORTRAN77 in FORTRAN 90
  • From: vinnie
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: kia
• Polynomial fitting routines?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Why pgf90 can not recognize some intrinsic function when compiling?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Why pgf90 can not recognize some intrinsic function when compiling?
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Why pgf90 can not recognize some intrinsic function when compiling?
  • From: Leo.Aries.G@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Why pgf90 can not recognize some intrinsic function when compiling?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Why pgf90 can not recognize some intrinsic function when compiling?
  • From: Leo.Aries.G@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Mr Hrundi V Bakshi
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Gfortran status
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Executing Fortran Code One Line at a Time
  • From: Matt
• Re: Gfortran status
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Gfortran status
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Fortran binding to C++ libraries
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Gfortran status (was: Re: programming GUIs)
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Gfortran status
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Gfortran status (was: Re: programming GUIs)
  • From: ejko123
• Re: writing at the end of the lines
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: writing at the end of the lines
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: writing at the end of the lines
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Robert Baer
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Executing Fortran Code One Line at a Time
  • From: Jim
• Re: Fortran binding to C++ libraries
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Namelist correctness question
  • From: Jerry DeLisle
• Re: how can I know if two pointers are equal??
  • From: robin
• Re: Executing Fortran Code One Line at a Time
  • From: Jim
• Re: Problem that goes away when I turn debug on
  • From: robin
• Executing Fortran Code One Line at a Time
  • From: Matt
• Re: Namelist correctness question
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Namelist correctness question
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Namelist correctness question
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Namelist correctness question
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Helge Avlesen
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: writing at the end of the lines
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: writing at the end of the lines
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: how can I know if two pointers are equal??
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Michael Prager
• how can I know if two pointers are equal??
  • From: Millena
• Re: writing at the end of the lines
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Re: F200x status?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: F200x status?
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: robin
• Re: writing at the end of the lines
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: writing at the end of the lines
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: writing at the end of the lines
  • From: Richard Maine
• writing at the end of the lines
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Re: F200x status?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: ADVANCE='NO' and X format? Was Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• ADVANCE='NO' and X format? Was Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: John Harper
• Re: F200x status?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: F200x status?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: F200x status?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: analyst41
• F200x status?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Fortran binding to C++ libraries
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Namelist correctness question
  • From: Jerry DeLisle
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: David Ham
• Re: Namelist correctness question
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Namelist correctness question
  • From: Jerry DeLisle
• Re: array
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Namelist correctness question
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: array
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: associated pointer on 0 size vector
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: array
  • From: Jerry DeLisle
• array
  • From: srilanka
• Namelist correctness question
  • From: Jerry DeLisle
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: analyst41
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: vin
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: David Ham
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: David Ham
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: vin
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: David Flower
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Nestor Grion
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: associated pointer on 0 size vector
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: analyst41
• Re: help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• help needed with Sun f77 format
  • From: analyst41
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: robin
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: John Harper
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Problem that goes away when I turn debug on
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: Problem that goes away when I turn debug on
  • From: Johan
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: BornAgainFortraner
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler
  • From: acp693
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Dick Russell
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Dick Russell
• Pretty good debugger
  • From: Al Worth
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: BornAgainFortraner
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: BornAgainFortraner
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Joost
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Problem that goes away when I turn debug on
  • From: Dave Taylor
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: BornAgainFortraner
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Some formatting problems
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Some formatting problems
  • From: BornAgainFortraner
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Joost
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Helge Avlesen
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Joost
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Lawson Wakefield
• RE: programming GUIs
  • From: meek
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Joost
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Helge Avlesen
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Joost
• Re: default initialisation
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: How to link libraries statically on Linux
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: vincent.magnin
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Jon Harrop
• default initialisation
  • From: Joost
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Helge Avlesen
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: David Ham
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: David Ham
• Re: associated pointer on 0 size vector
  • From: Umberto D'Ortona
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Mario Ospelt
• Re: How to link libraries statically on Linux
  • From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Helge Avlesen
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Mario Ospelt
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: robin
• Re: Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: programming GUIs
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Michael Wild
• Re: Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: apm
• Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• programming GUIs
  • From: Mario Ospelt
• Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Michael Wild
• Re: Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc
  • From: Michael Wild
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?
  • From: ferrad
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Nestor Grion
• Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?
  • From: ferrad
• Re: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?
  • From: David Ham
• RE: Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?
  • From: meek
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: associated pointer on 0 size vector
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Are all reals which start with FF or 7F NaN's ?
  • From: ferrad
• Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler
  • From: acp693
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• [Fortran 77] A library for fetching a web page through HTTP ?
  • From: Thomas Baruchel
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Richard Maine
• associated pointer on 0 size vector
  • From: Umberto D'Ortona
• Re: random_number
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: associated pointer on 0 size vector
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: David Ham
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Rich Townsend
• FYI: "Fortran replaced by C" -- USDO Energy
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: David Ham
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Aleramo
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: David Flower
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc
  • From: Reinhold Bader
• Re: Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Pointers versus Allocatables
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Max
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Max
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Max
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Aleramo
• Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc
  • From: Michael Wild
• Re: Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Michael Wild
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: MPIF90
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Differance between Fortran 90 and C
  • From: Aleramo
• Re: the problem of declaring a function in the interface
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: the problem of declaring a function in the interface
  • From: Jurang
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: phaccount
• Re: MPIF90
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: gfortran and graphical windows ?
  • From: vin
• Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Tom
• Re: [g77/95] How to link libraries statically on Linux
  • From: wob96
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: random_number
  • From: Rich Townsend
• MPIF90
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: [g77/95] How to link libraries statically on Linux
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Tom
• Re: random_number
  • From: robin
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: robin
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: robin
• Re: problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc
  • From: Michael Wild
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Tom
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: gfortran and graphical windows ?
  • From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
• Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: How to link libraries statically on Linux
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Tom
• Re: G95 Trace Back?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: deleting an element from the linked list
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• [g77/95] How to link libraries statically on Linux
  • From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
• Re: deleting an element from the linked list
  • From: Joost
• deleting an element from the linked list
  • From: Millena
• Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?
  • From: S7Solutions
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: David Flower
• Re: [newbie] the problem of declaring a function in the interface
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: help for Library
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: help for Library
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Louis Krupp
• problems with mpich installation on beowulf cluster with ifort and icc
  • From: antonioparodi74
• Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Andy Spragg
• help for Library
  • From: TC
• Re: derived type for dates
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: wakun
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Nestor Grion
• Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: kia
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Lynn
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler
  • From: acp693
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Max
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: linking acml library with salford ftn compiler
  • From: Max
• Re: about c to fortran
  • From: Dan Nagle
• about c to fortran
  • From: wakun
• Re: G95 Trace Back?
  • From: Helge Avlesen
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Lynn
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Lynn
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: James Giles
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Random number (object) problem. One solution?
  • From: Nestor Grion
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• linking acml library with salford ftn compiler
  • From: acp693
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Important: is Alpha
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: Ira Baxter
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Important: is Alpha
  • From: TC
• Re: Fortran derived type and C struct passing character
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Fortran derived type and C struct passing character
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: not able to use implicit none
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Fortran derived type and C struct passing character
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: robert . corbett
• LAPACK & Intel 9.0: unexpected behaviour (bug?)
  • From: Tom
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: G95 Trace Back?
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: G95 Trace Back?
  • From: Andy Vaught
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: not able to use implicit none
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Re: what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• what weren't structure/union/map made part of F77/90 ?
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Surendar Jeyadev
• BOZ-literal-constant conversion?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: not able to use implicit none
  • From: richard . koolhans
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: David Ham
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: David Ham
• Re: G95 Trace Back?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• gfortran and graphical windows ?
  • From: vincent.magnin
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Fortran derived type and C struct passing character
  • From: Brian McKenna
• Re: the problem of declaring a function in the interface
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: the problem of declaring a function in the interface
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• derived type for dates
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: the problem of declaring a function in the interface
  • From: Jurang
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: random_number
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: random_number
  • From: James Giles
• Re: random_number
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: not able to use implicit none
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: not able to use implicit none
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Re: random_number
  • From: robin
• Re: random_number
  • From: robin
• Re: random_number
  • From: robin
• Re: random_number
  • From: robin
• Re: [newbie] the problem of declaring a function in the interface
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: not able to use implicit none
  • From: Dan Nagle
• [newbie] the problem of declaring a function in the interface
  • From: Jurang
• Re: not able to use implicit none
  • From: Jonas Stein
• not able to use implicit none
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: G95 Trace Back?
  • From: Helge Avlesen
• G95 Trace Back?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: TRIM
  • From: analyst41
• Re: TRIM
  • From: analyst41
• RE: Group Deterioration
  • From: meek
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: TRIM
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: Andreas Ernst
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: Andreas Ernst
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: Mark Westwood
• Re: USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler
  • From: Les
• Re: USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler
  • From: Les
• Re: Derived type name as a dummy argument - possible?
  • From: David Ham
• USE statement problem with MIPSpro Fortran 90 compiler
  • From: Lucian Anton
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Derived type name as a dummy argument - possible?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Derived type name as a dummy argument - possible?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: random_number
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Derived type name as a dummy argument - possible?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: random_number
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Derived type name as a dummy argument - possible?
  • From: David
• Re: Group Deterioration
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: random_number
  • From: James Giles
• Group Deterioration
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: random_number
  • From: robin
• Re: random_number
  • From: robin
• Re: random_number
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: robin
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: robin
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: kia
• Re: SVD, Divide and Conquer, LAPACK, DGELSD problem
  • From: Damien
• Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?
  • From: wob96
• Re: SVD, Divide and Conquer, LAPACK, DGELSD problem
  • From: Hanyou Chu
• Re: Intel VF 9 work with Visual Studio 2005?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Intel VF 9 work with Visual Studio 2005?
  • From: Haje Korth
• Re: TRIM
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRIM
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Intel VF 9 work with Visual Studio 2005?
  • From: Al Worth
• Re: random_number
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Intel VF 9 work with Visual Studio 2005?
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: random_number
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Intel VF 9 work with Visual Studio 2005?
  • From: Al Worth
• Re: SVD, Divide and Conquer, LAPACK, DGELSD problem
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: random_number
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: Andreas Ernst
• SVD, Divide and Conquer, LAPACK, DGELSD problem
  • From: CheJJ
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code (OT)
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Memory determination from Fortran Source Code
  • From: Andreas Ernst
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Nestor
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: random_number
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Nestor
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Nestor
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: random_number
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: TRIM
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: random_number
  • From: robin
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: robin
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: robin
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: random_number
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: minloc with .false. mask
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: write a main program into a subroutine
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: write a main program into a subroutine
  • From: PCAT
• Re: TRIM
  • From: James Giles
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: James Giles
• Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?
  • From: wob96
• Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?
  • From: wob96
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: write a main program into a subroutine
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: write a main program into a subroutine
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Dan Nagle
• write a main program into a subroutine
  • From: PCAT
• write a main program into a subroutine
  • From: PCAT
• Re: Converting unformatted data
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: MERGE in recursive function
  • From: robin
• Re: random_number
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: random_number
  • From: robin
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: robin
• Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Invalid forward reference
  • From: Toby White
• Re: minloc with .false. mask
  • From: Les
• Re: minloc with .false. mask
  • From: [JvO]
• [ANN] Data Plotting Library DISLIN 9.0
  • From: Helmut Michels
• Re: Converting unformatted data
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Converting unformatted data
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Converting unformatted data
  • From: Helge Avlesen
• Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Converting unformatted data
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: minloc with .false. mask
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Converting unformatted data
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: MERGE in recursive function
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: MERGE in recursive function
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: kia
• Re: How to download gfortran?
  • From: elizabeth . l . yip
• Re: How to download gfortran?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: How to download gfortran?
  • From: elizabeth . l . yip
• Re: MERGE in recursive function
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: MERGE in recursive function
  • From: James Giles
• Re: MERGE in recursive function
  • From: Richard E Maine
• MERGE in recursive function
  • From: John Harper
• Re: indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: Dan Nagle
• X11 libraries for FORTRAN on OSX or Linux?
  • From: wob96
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Converting unformatted data
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: robin
• Converting unformatted data
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: How to download gfortran?
  • From: elizabeth . l . yip
• Re: module mt95
  • From: gpiroux
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: TRIM
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRIM
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRIM
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: TRIM
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Fortran BOF (Birds of a Feather) session at Supercomputing '05
  • From: David Frank
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Martin Glaser
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Michael Prager
• Re: WRITE + new line
  • From: Dan Nagle
• WRITE + new line
  • From: Martin Glaser
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: "Floating point decode error"
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: call by value/reference conundrum (C<->Fortran)
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: module mt95
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: minloc with .false. mask
  • From: Rich Townsend
• minloc with .false. mask
  • From: David Ham
• Re: TRIM
  • From: Rich Townsend
• module mt95
  • From: gpiroux
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Floating point decode error"
  • From: Random Programmer
• Re: fortran 90/95 standart
  • From: Patrick Begou
• Re: TRIM
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• re: TRIM
  • From: robin
• Re: "Floating point decode error"
  • From: robin
• Re: indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: Invalid forward reference
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: Robert Baer
• Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM)
  • From: tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: "Floating point decode error"
  • From: Richard Maine
• "Floating point decode error"
  • From: Random Programmer
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: James Giles
• Re: indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM)
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: Stefano Baroni
• Re: indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• indirect recursion in f90/95
  • From: Stefano Baroni
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Robin Vowels nonsense
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM)
  • From: robin
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: robin
• Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• RE: MS Fortran 5
  • From: meek
• RE: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77
  • From: meek
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: call by value/reference conundrum (C<->Fortran)
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM)
  • From: kia
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions
  • From: Franck LERAY
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions
  • From: Franck LERAY
• Re: Fortran BOF (Birds of a Feather) session at Supercomputing '05
  • From: David Frank
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Invalid forward reference
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Townsent's nonsense
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM)
  • From: tholen
• Townsent's nonsense (was: TRIM)
  • From: kia
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: robin
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: robin
• Re: Help with one linking problem
  • From: PCAT
• Help with one linking problem
  • From: PCAT
• Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions
  • From: Jim
• Re: call by value/reference conundrum (C<->Fortran)
  • From: Jim
• Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: DNUM and JNUM fonctions
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• DNUM and JNUM fonctions
  • From: Franck LERAY
• call by value/reference conundrum (C<->Fortran)
  • From: phaccount
• Fortran BOF (Birds of a Feather) session at Supercomputing '05
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: MS Fortran 5
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Invalid forward reference
  • From: Toby White
• Re: MS Fortran 5
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: MS Fortran 5
  • From: John Doe
• Re: Decoding real variables expressed as binary
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM]
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: MS Fortran 5
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM]
  • From: mcalhoun
• Re: First-chance exception in ****.exe: 0xC0000091: Float Overflow
  • From: Anita
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: MS Fortran 5
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM]
  • From: James Giles
• Re: fortran 90/95 standart
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• RE: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77
  • From: meek
• Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77
  • From: Jim
• Re: MS Fortran 5
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: should i write keywords uppercase?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM]
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM]
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: First-chance exception in ****.exe: 0xC0000091: Float Overflow
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM]
  • From: Rich Townsend
• First-chance exception in ****.exe: 0xC0000091: Float Overflow
  • From: Anita
• Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM]
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Challenge! [was Re: TRIM]
  • From: David Frank
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: David Frank
• Challenge! [was Re: TRIM]
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: should i write keywords uppercase?
  • From: David Flower
• Re: should i write keywords uppercase?
  • From: David Flower
• Re: should i write keywords uppercase?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: writing to binary
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: fortran 90/95 standart
  • From: Patrick Begou
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• COCO and/ior CPP users?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: MS Fortran 5
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• MS Fortran 5
  • From: Doug H.
• Re: changing argument types for four functions
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Desktop Cyber
  • From: bv
• Re: changing argument types for four functions
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: fortran 90/95 standart
  • From: James Giles
• Re: fortran 90/95 standart
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77
  • From: James Giles
• Re: fortran 90/95 standart
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: fortran 90/95 standart
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: fortran 90/95 standart
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: fortran 90/95 standart
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: fortran 90/95 standart
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Help! I'm new to Fortran 77
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: TRIM.
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: writing to binary
  • From: rawlins02