Re: Bailey's high-precision package

Arjen Markus wrote:
> As far as I know, MS Powerstation is not a Fortran 90 compiler.

MS Powerstation 4.0 was a Fortran 90 compiler. It did not have a good
reputation. Digital Visual Fortran was its successor, at least in a
marketing sense.

> Your best bet is to upgrade to a more recent compiler.

Yes.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Virtual PC with XP Mode cannot recognize DOSXMSF.EXE
    ... However version 1.0 of the compiler ... Naturally if you just run your fortran program under any x86_64 OS ... DOSXMSF is the Phar Lap TNT extender used by the old PowerStation ... If your version of windows can run MS-DOS stuff ok ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Microsoft style:
    ... countries separated by a common language") are surprisingly nontrivial. ... I was once given a Mark Williams C compiler and told to translate a program we were ... Your FORTRAN hand include-files? ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: Baileys high-precision package
    ... >> As far as I know, MS Powerstation is not a Fortran 90 compiler. ... to the Digital successor to MS PowerStation; ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Then and now
    ... Today a $2 calculator will run for a couple years on a battery, ... programmed in ForTran using the WatFor ... It was fortran 4 (language) with the waterloo compiler 4 in Fortran ...
    (alt.home.repair)
  • Re: A question on Newtons Method
    ... >> I can't believe you'd advise a noob to use a compiler which is still ... > production codes and codes from textbooks. ... > The Fortran standard generally does not specify the required behavior ... >> another important class of hassle which most numerical programmers ...
    (sci.math.num-analysis)