Re: Need interpretation

Richard E Maine wrote: 
Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Thanks Richard, I think we'll leave as is then.  This is related to pr25139 in
case you were wondering.



Ok. Just now looked at that. Basically, I'm agreeing with Dale Ranta's
comment 27 there, even though he said it in 6 lines and I took...
well... a lot more.

Yes, but I understood your explanation.  :)
.