Re: How to halt a running program without losing data?
- From: "Mr Hrundi V Bakshi" <mrhrundivbakshi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:47:45 -0500
"Walter Spector" <w6ws_xthisoutx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43B41F2F.B6CB5B70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>.. the ad-hoc approach of polling a data file is not always
> reliable, and can carry performance problems.
Nor is it secure or robust: it's a naive high approach that's as good as
fortran is likely to come with.
>
> C programmers have always been able to use a portable signal facility
> that is part of the standard library, but Fortran programmers have not
> been so lucky.
>
> Once again I will note that the POSIX.9 Standard corrects this deficiency
> for Fortran by defining a portable interface to sigaction and friends.
>
Now you're talking: if only the self-appointed fortran cretins of clf could
comprehend; perhaps it's because the POSIX Standard is courtesy of anything
but fortran.
Happy New Year,
Hrundi V.B.
:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),
:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:),:).
.
- References:
- Re: How to halt a running program without losing data?
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: How to halt a running program without losing data?
- From: *** Russell
- Re: How to halt a running program without losing data?
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Re: How to halt a running program without losing data?
- From: *** Russell
- Re: How to halt a running program without losing data?
- From: Walter Spector
- Re: How to halt a running program without losing data?
- Prev by Date: Re: How to halt a running program without losing data?
- Next by Date: Re: dumb question #1 re: DO loops
- Previous by thread: Re: How to halt a running program without losing data?
- Next by thread: Wave that shook the world
- Index(es):