Re: Newline (linefeed) suppress.

Rich Townsend <rhdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dishanker Rajakulendren wrote:

This works using ifort in GNU/Linux. Thanks.

ADVANCE='no' should also work on ifort. I'm surprised that it doesn't; what
command-line options are you using?

Indeed I detect a contradiction here in the stated requirement of
sticking to Fortran 77. None of the stated solutions are Fortran 77, so
if the requirement is actually, as stated, to use Fortran 77, then these
don't do it. If the requirement is just to use something that works with
whatever compiler he has, that could make sense... except that ifort is
an f95 compiler. It also does f77, but is not restricted to that.

--
Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience;
email: my first.last at org.domain| experience comes from bad judgment.
org: nasa, domain: gov | -- Mark Twain
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: allocating arrays, trouble
    ... the funny thing I now tried to compile it with g95. ... But anyway this if Fortran. ... The ifort ... program to work with ifort, perhaps with smaller arrays, in a test version, ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: [Intel Compiler 8.1] C++ calling Fortran Routine
    ... Fortran compiler earlier than ifort 8.0, you will need that library, and you ... but you need to know the additional libraries involved in icpc ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: [Intel Compiler 8.1] C++ calling Fortran Routine
    ... Fortran compiler earlier than ifort 8.0, you will need that library, and you ... but you need to know the additional libraries involved in icpc ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • Re: File reading problem
    ... It is actually quite easy to add a GUI to most console based applications using GINO (and your favorite F95 compiler). ... Of course the software contains a routine to ... Visual Fortran would be the most natural ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • possible ifort bug ???
    ... I'm not sure if I'm correct, but I think I found a bug in ifort (intel ... I compiled it with both ifort and lahey fortran under ... Here are the output of lahey fortran, which is correct (I cut only to ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)