Re: Converting fixed-to-free format



Ken Plotkin wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:07:42 GMT, Joe Krahn <jkrahn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

having to fix manually like REAL X(1). Then we could think about the future of Fortran without worrying so much about billions of lines of old code.


Those billions of lines of existing code *are* the future of Fortran.

Every step taken toward deliberate incompatibility is another nail in
the coffin.

Ken Plotkin

It sounds like you are saying Fortran is only alive now to keep all that archaic code useful. If that's all Fortran is to you, then it's already dead.

Besides, with a good archaic-to-modern Fortran converter, archaic humans can still write archaic code. My primary point is that there should be no need to worry about mixing archaic and modern code into the same source file, and an archaic-to-modern converter would keep all existing cond working indefinitely, without compiler develeopers having to deal with all the extra effort.

Joe
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
    ... It sounds like you are saying Fortran is only alive now to keep all that archaic code useful. ... My primary point is that there should be no need to worry about mixing archaic and modern code into the same source file, and an archaic-to-modern converter would keep all existing cond working indefinitely, without compiler develeopers having to deal with all the extra effort. ... Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org ... Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die"
    ... Ken Plotkin wrote: ... > From the paragraph you quoted, he's clearly not an expert on Fortran. ... I see that he's expert in garbage collection. ... I/O provisions in a nice modular design. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: questions on binary vs text files
    ... "Ken Plotkin" wrote in message ... > Usually sequential binary files. ... under CVF to write out double precision data that I can read into Matlab. ... Is that truly what "stream" will give me in Fortran 2003? ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: An embedded DB engine
    ... Ken Plotkin writes: ... wasting a lot of time to rewrite libraries that I've done because ... they don't want a solution in Fortran. ... And supporting a Fortran API wil require documenting/testing ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Visual Fortran - super quick questions
    ... Ken Plotkin wrote: ... executed by a call from the GUI. ... The Fortran engine is in a DLL, ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)