Re: Standards conforming or not?
- From: "Michael Metcalf" <michaelmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:01:43 GMT
"Bruce Bowler" <bbowler@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.02.27.14.27.38.589097@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Does the following code conform to the Fortran 95 standard?
No. If an array is assumed-size, the DIM parameter must be present in the
reference to SIZE. Of course, with assumed-shape and an explicit interface
all would work as expected.
Regards,
Mike Metcalf
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Standards conforming or not?
- From: Bruce Bowler
- Re: Standards conforming or not?
- References:
- Standards conforming or not?
- From: Bruce Bowler
- Standards conforming or not?
- Prev by Date: Re: Variable length/precision formats?
- Next by Date: Re: Standards conforming or not?
- Previous by thread: Standards conforming or not?
- Next by thread: Re: Standards conforming or not?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|