Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: Michael Prager <Mike.Prager.indigo@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:22:22 -0500
Joe Krahn <jkrahn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It sounds like you are saying Fortran is only alive now to keep all that
archaic code useful. If that's all Fortran is to you, then it's already
dead.
Look, Fortran is not used mainly to write word processors, or
silly games, or other programs with limited lifespan. It is
used for mathematical and engineering calculations. Those
programs and routines become "archaic" far slower one might
imagine. I am no fan of fixed format, and I'm an enthusiastic
user of F9x5, but I see no value added in REQUIRING periodic
revision of functioning code to get it working with the latest
standard. Quite the opposite: fiddling with working and proven
code just introduces errors.
--
Mike Prager, NOAA, Beaufort, NC
Address spam-trapped; remove color to reply.
* Opinions expressed are personal and not represented otherwise.
* Any use of tradenames does not constitute a NOAA endorsement.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: James Giles
- Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- References:
- Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: Ken Plotkin
- Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: Joe Krahn
- Converting fixed-to-free format
- Prev by Date: Re: Regular expression parsers
- Next by Date: Re: Informations about G95
- Previous by thread: Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- Next by thread: Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|