Re: Standards conforming or not?
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Maine)
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:33:32 -0800
Michael Metcalf <michaelmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The size of the * dimension is simply not available,
And that is the central concept here. All the rest is the standard
elaborating the consequences of that in detail. Once you have the basic
concept, the rest pretty much follows. Anything that would need the size
is disallowed.
--
Richard Maine | Good judgement comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Standards conforming or not?
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: Standards conforming or not?
- References:
- Standards conforming or not?
- From: Bruce Bowler
- Re: Standards conforming or not?
- From: Michael Metcalf
- Re: Standards conforming or not?
- From: Bruce Bowler
- Re: Standards conforming or not?
- From: Michael Metcalf
- Standards conforming or not?
- Prev by Date: Re: Informations about G95
- Next by Date: Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- Previous by thread: Re: Standards conforming or not?
- Next by thread: Re: Standards conforming or not?
- Index(es):