Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen <jvorbrueggen-not@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:22:28 +0100
Different folks, different strokes I guess. Not surprising, perhaps, CVF
even even permits such a monster with the use of (no)freeform
delineators within the procedure - but I'll have you strung up by your
toes should you entertain making such a perverse concoction.
If you want to compile codes that have mixed forms and get the benefit of
IPA with CVF, they need to be in one source file, IIRC - at least, at one
time Steve Lionel told me of the (NO)FREEFORM metacomments to solve that
problem.
Jan
.
- References:
- Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: Ken Plotkin
- Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: Michael Prager
- Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: James Giles
- Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: Ken Plotkin
- Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- From: kia
- Converting fixed-to-free format
- Prev by Date: Re: Standards conforming or not?
- Next by Date: Re: dll fortran for visual basic .net (little bit long data output)
- Previous by thread: Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- Next by thread: Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
- Index(es):