comp.lang.fortran

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Automatic allocation of an available file unit
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Automatic allocation of an available file unit
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: fortran code for 'cp' / subroutine file_copy
  • From: Joost
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: fortran code for 'cp' / subroutine file_copy
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Automatic allocation of an available file unit
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Automatic allocation of an available file unit
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: fortran code for 'cp' / subroutine file_copy
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: question on character-like variable defination
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: fortran code for 'cp' / subroutine file_copy
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: fortran code for 'cp' / subroutine file_copy
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Automatic allocation of an available file unit
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Automatic allocation of an available file unit
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Automatic allocation of an available file unit
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: fortran code for 'cp' / subroutine file_copy
  • From: Joost
• RE: question on character-like variable defination
  • From: meek
• RE: fortran code for 'cp' / subroutine file_copy
  • From: meek
• Re: fortran code for 'cp' / subroutine file_copy
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• fortran code for 'cp' / subroutine file_copy
  • From: Carsten Lemmen
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: AN O'Nymous
• Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: AN O'Nymous
• Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: Joost
• Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Automatic allocation of an available file unit
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: question on character-like variable defination
  • From: James Giles
• Re: question on character-like variable defination
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: question on character-like variable defination
  • From: James Giles
• question on character-like variable defination
  • From: sunnylele
• O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
  • From: AN O'Nymous
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Help: IFC stack overflow
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Automatic allocation of an available file unit
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Ian Gay
• Re: Help: IFC stack overflow
  • From: Ben
• Re: Help: IFC stack overflow
  • From: Joost
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: Dmitry Gorbatovsky
• Re: Help: IFC stack overflow
  • From: Ben
• Re: procedure argument
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Help: IFC stack overflow
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Help: IFC stack overflow
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: procedure argument
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Help: IFC stack overflow
  • From: Joost
• Re: Help: IFC stack overflow
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Help: IFC stack overflow
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Making fortran libraries
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Help: IFC stack overflow
  • From: Joost
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Walter Spector
• Help: IFC stack overflow
  • From: Ben
• procedure argument
  • From: Roland Schmehl
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: How to link a Fortran static library to a C++ program?
  • From: Guch Wu
• Re: How to link a Fortran static library to a C++ program?
  • From: Guch Wu
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Making fortran libraries
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: use a c dll in fortran?
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Making fortran libraries
  • From: stuart Lynn
• Making fortran libraries
  • From: stuart Lynn
• Re: How to link a Fortran static library to a C++ program?
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Walter Spector
• use a c dll in fortran?
  • From: tripplowe
• Re: How to link a Fortran static library to a C++ program?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: How to link a Fortran static library to a C++ program?
  • From: Guch Wu
• Re: How to link a Fortran static library to a C++ program?
  • From: Guch Wu
• Re: How to link a Fortran static library to a C++ program?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: How to link a Fortran static library to a C++ program?
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Walter Spector
• RE: JOB - SHOP & FORTRAN 77
  • From: meek
• How to link a Fortran static library to a C++ program?
  • From: Guch Wu
• Re: Retrieving position of a dialog in (Compaq) Visual Fortran
  • From: berger@xxxxxx
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Joost
• Re: send array using MPI
  • From: Fabian Braennstroem
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: simon
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Joost
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Joost
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Enum not found in PNNL FLIB library
  • From: Andy
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: James Giles
• Structure of large link libraries in f95
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: jussij
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Using Java to read unformatted Fortran output files?
  • From: stocksami@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sharing generic names among functions and subroutines
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: David
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: send array using MPI
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: send array using MPI
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: send array using MPI
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: send array using MPI
  • From: Douglas Sondak
• Re: Sharing generic names among functions and subroutines
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: send array using MPI
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Salford FTN95 Access violation on compile time
  • From: Mathemagician
• Re: Salford FTN95 Access violation on compile time
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Salford FTN95 Access violation on compile time
  • From: Mathemagician
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: feenberg
• Re: Calling Matlab in Compaq visual fortran at Windows XP
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: send array using MPI
  • From: Michael Wild
• Re: send array using MPI
  • From: Fabian Braennstroem
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: David Flower
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: send array using MPI
  • From: Michael Wild
• send array using MPI
  • From: Fabian Braennstroem
• Re: Calling Matlab in Compaq visual fortran at Windows XP
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Ian Gay
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Ian Gay
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: Dmitry Gorbatovsky
• ANN: Free Fortran Tools with F on AMD64
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: Sharing generic names among functions and subroutines
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Sharing generic names among functions and subroutines
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Sharing generic names among functions and subroutines
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: Dmitry Gorbatovsky
• Re: Retrieving position of a dialog in (Compaq) Visual Fortran
  • From: jdujic
• Re: Using Java to read unformatted Fortran output files?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Calling Matlab in Compaq visual fortran at Windows XP
  • From: Ic-Pyo Hong
• Using Java to read unformatted Fortran output files?
  • From: stocksami@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: Michael Wild
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: Ronald Benedik
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Problems about Mixed programming with C++ and Fortran
  • From: Joe Krahn
• C versus FORTRAN90
  • From: ambi
• Re: is there as simple way to drive html with fortran ?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Ian Gay
• Re: Salford FTN95 Access violation on compile time
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: is there as simple way to drive html with fortran ?
  • From: Anton Haumer
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: is there as simple way to drive html with fortran ?
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Salford FTN95 Access violation on compile time
  • From: Mathemagician
• Re: Salford FTN95 Access violation on compile time
  • From: Mathemagician
• Re: is there as simple way to drive html with fortran ?
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Salford FTN95 Access violation on compile time
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: is there as simple way to drive html with fortran ?
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Joost
• Re: Command-line argument parsing library?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Bil . Kleb
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• is there as simple way to drive html with fortran ?
  • From: Philippe Lehert
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Joost
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: AN O'Nymous
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Joost
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: Joost
• Re: .mod generation question
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Problems about Mixed programming with C++ and Fortran
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: Rich Townsend
• how can I use progress control in FORTRAN PowerStation 4.0
  • From: shengbaojun
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: AN O'Nymous
• Re: Command-line argument parsing library?
  • From: Dmitry Gorbatovsky
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: beliavsky
• Efficient neighbourhood searching
  • From: AN O'Nymous
• Re: Salford FTN95 Access violation on compile time
  • From: Mathemagician
• Re: Salford FTN95 Access violation on compile time
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: RNGs for normal distributions
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Salford FTN95 Access violation on compile time
  • From: Mathemagician
• Re: Using Orderpack...
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Using Orderpack...
  • From: tripplowe
• .mod generation question
  • From: Joost
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Joost
• Re: Enum not found in PNNL FLIB library
  • From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Setting/Using Exit Handlers
  • From: R. MacDonald
• Re: Problems about Mixed programming with C++ and Fortran
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Retrieving position of a dialog in (Compaq) Visual Fortran
  • From: Steve Lionel
• RE: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: meek
• Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Setting/Using Exit Handlers
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Retrieving position of a dialog in (Compaq) Visual Fortran
  • From: berger@xxxxxx
• Command-line argument parsing library?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Need suggestion on Sparse Matrix Library
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Strings with escape sequences.
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: robin
• Re: Strings with escape sequences.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Can anybody compile and run this code?
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Setting/Using Exit Handlers
  • From: R. MacDonald
• Re: Strings with escape sequences.
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: function problem
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Problems about Mixed programming with C++ and Fortran
  • From: Guch Wu
• Re: RNGs for normal distributions
  • From: AN O'Nymous
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Michael Wild
• Re: Problems about Mixed programming with C++ and Fortran
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Strings with escape sequences.
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Strings with escape sequences.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Strings with escape sequences.
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Strings with escape sequences.
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Strings with escape sequences.
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: buying old copy of Microsoft,Powerstation Fortran
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: short size for transfer
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: kia
• Re: buying old copy of Microsoft,Powerstation Fortran
  • From: kia
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: short size for transfer
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: RNGs for normal distributions
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Enum not found in PNNL FLIB library
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Enum not found in PNNL FLIB library
  • From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
• short size for transfer
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Enum not found in PNNL FLIB library
  • From: Joost
• Re: finding the type name of a variable in fortran
  • From: Ron Shepard
• [g95] Enum not found in PNNL FLIB library
  • From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
• Re: RNGs for normal distributions
  • From: AN O'Nymous
• Re: Problems about Mixed programming with C++ and Fortran
  • From: Guch Wu
• Re: RNGs for normal distributions
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• RNGs for normal distributions
  • From: AN O'Nymous
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: James Giles
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Object library problem
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: Joost
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Can anybody compile and run this code?
  • From: robin
• Re: How can I use dreal and dimag in a f90 program?
  • From: robin
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Dan Nagle
• powers of five
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Dmitry Gorbatovsky
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Dmitry Gorbatovsky
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: x
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: robin
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Can anybody compile and run this code?
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Character String Dynamic Allocation
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: array definition with reshape - f90 , Compaq tru64
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: David Flower
• Re: array definition with reshape - f90 , Compaq tru64
  • From: Damien MATTEI
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Can anybody compile and run this code?
  • From: Sergio
• Re: array definition with reshape - f90 , Compaq tru64
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: James Parsly
• Re: Unions in Fortran
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Need suggestion on Sparse Matrix Library
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: compilation with ifort9 aborts with strange message
  • From: tommyA
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Dan Nagle
• I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
  • From: x
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Kobe
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: James Giles
• Unions in Fortran
  • From: s8ngsu3
• Re: Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: s8ngsu3
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: array definition with reshape - f90 , Compaq tru64
  • From: Damien MATTEI
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: DVG
• Mixing programming with Lisp
  • From: Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky
• Problems about Mixed programming with C++ and Fortran
  • From: Guch
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Need suggestion on Sparse Matrix Library
  • From: andywenj@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: How can I use dreal and dimag in a f90 program?
  • From: AeroSpace Ed
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: kia
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: STOP while writing
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: Richard Maine
• STOP while writing
  • From: John Harper
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Tom Micevski
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: ellips
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Michael Prager
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Michael Prager
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Extra parentheses matter in internal read?
  • From: ellips
• Re: Interaction of generic names and assumed size arguments
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Dan Nagle
• RE: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: meek
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Interaction of generic names and assumed size arguments
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Interaction of generic names and assumed size arguments
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Interaction of generic names and assumed size arguments
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: compilation with ifort9 aborts with strange message
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Craig Powers
• C style compound assignment operators
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: Interaction of generic names and assumed size arguments
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Interaction of generic names and assumed size arguments
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Interaction of generic names and assumed size arguments
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Interaction of generic names and assumed size arguments
  • From: Joost
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Gareth Owen
• Re: Interaction of generic names and assumed size arguments
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Interaction of generic names and assumed size arguments
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: ramanath
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Interaction of generic names and assumed size arguments
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: How can I use dreal and dimag in a f90 program?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Les
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Les
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Phillip
• Re: Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: Shriram Ramanathan
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: i . chivers
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: gary . l . scott
• compilation with ifort9 aborts with strange message
  • From: tommyA
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: array definition with reshape - f90 , Compaq tru64
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Joost
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Gareth Owen
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Object library problem
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• RE: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: meek
• Re: array definition with reshape - f90 , Compaq tru64
  • From: Damien MATTEI
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Vincent MAGNIN
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Integrated Developement Environment - looked for...
  • From: Phillip
• Re: How can I use dreal and dimag in a f90 program?
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: array definition with reshape - f90 , Compaq tru64
  • From: Joost
• array definition with reshape - f90 , Compaq tru64
  • From: Damien MATTEI
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Erik Edelmann
• Re: Object library problem
  • From: Dieter Britz
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: jwm
• Not-equals as '#' ?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Strings with escape sequences.
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Strings with escape sequences.
  • From: James Giles
• Strings with escape sequences.
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Allocatable derived type with allocatable components in fortran 90
  • From: dont
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: Patrick L. Nolan
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: Ben
• Nomenclature for entity(...) ?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Variable length/precision formats?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: Ben
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Using MS VB to debug fotran code (*.f files)
  • From: J.F. Cornwall
• Help: declare an array without knowing the rank and size
  • From: laserbin
• Re: Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Object library problem
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Using MS VB to debug fotran code (*.f files)
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Jim
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: g77 double precision data initialization problem
  • From: mvuk
• Re: Derived types with derived types with allocatables
  • From: Les
• Re: Derived types with derived types with allocatables
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Object library problem
  • From: Dieter Britz
• Re: g77 double precision data initialization problem
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Using MS VB to debug fotran code (*.f files)
  • From: Bhima
• Re: Derived types with derived types with allocatables
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Derived types with derived types with allocatables
  • From: Arno
• Re: Derived types with derived types with allocatables
  • From: Les
• Re: Derived types with derived types with allocatables
  • From: Joost
• Re: Derived types with derived types with allocatables
  • From: Arno
• Re: Derived types with derived types with allocatables
  • From: Joost
• Derived types with derived types with allocatables
  • From: Arno
• Re: Variable length/precision formats?
  • From: robin
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: jwm
• Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: how to eleminate the spurious ??
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Les
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: function problem
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Ben Hetland
• lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
  • From: chrisschardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How can I use dreal and dimag in a f90 program?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: How can I use dreal and dimag in a f90 program?
  • From: robin
• Re: How can I use dreal and dimag in a f90 program?
  • From: robin
• Re: function problem
  • From: robin
• Re: function problem
  • From: robin
• Re: function problem
  • From: robin
• Re: function problem
  • From: robin
• Re: Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: Jim
• Re: linear operators of IMSL fortran 90 MP library
  • From: andywenj@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: g77 double precision data initialization problem
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: function problem
  • From: John Harper
• Re: how to compute B*inv(A) efficiently ?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: function problem
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: g77 double precision data initialization problem
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: function problem
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Illegal internal write?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: function problem
  • From: pieterprovoost
• g77 double precision data initialization problem
  • From: mvuk
• Re: function problem
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: function problem
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: function problem
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: Write statement does not print correct value?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: function problem
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: function problem
  • From: Joost
• function problem
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: Write statement does not print correct value?
  • From: Joost
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Write statement does not print correct value?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Write statement does not print correct value?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Write statement does not print correct value?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Write statement does not print correct value?
  • From: Warner BRUNS
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Write statement does not print correct value?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Write statement does not print correct value?
  • From: jchauvin
• Re: What's the purpose of explicit interfaces? (Pun intended?)
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Dll for Excel
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: linear operators of IMSL fortran 90 MP library
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• help: linear operators of IMSL fortran 90 MP library
  • From: andywenj@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: how to compute B*inv(A) efficiently ?
  • From: andywenj@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Memory allocated
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Memory allocated
  • From: Keith Refson
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Dll for Excel
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Memory allocated
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Memory allocated
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Memory allocated
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Dll for Excel
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Dll for Excel
  • From: sbergero
• Re: how to eleminate the spurious ??
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: Memory allocated
  • From: Joost
• Re: how to compute B*inv(A) efficiently ?
  • From: Dave Seaman
• Re: Memory allocated
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Memory allocated
  • From: Joost
• Re: Memory allocated
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Memory allocated
  • From: kaper
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: James Giles
• Re: how to eleminate the spurious ??
  • From: Millena
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Illegal internal write?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: how to compute B*inv(A) efficiently ?
  • From: Joost
• how to compute B*inv(A) efficiently ?
  • From: andywenj@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Have you ever considered of mousing ambidextrously?
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: Dll for Excel
  • From: richard symonds
• Re: Dll for Excel
  • From: richard symonds
• Re: Dll for Excel
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: transnet
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Dll for Excel
  • From: richard symonds
• Re: Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: Jim
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: max
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: James Giles
• Will the *real* vms fortran please stand up? (historical questions)
  • From: transnet
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: how to eleminate the spurious ??
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Erik Edelmann
• Re: how to eleminate the spurious ??
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Erik Edelmann
• Re: What's the purpose of explicit interfaces? (Pun intended?)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: how to eleminate the spurious ??
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Statement functions
  • From: James Giles
• how to eleminate the spurious ??
  • From: Millena
• Re: Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
  • From: Kobe
• Re: Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Joost
• Re: Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Joost
• Re: Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Ugo
• Re: Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Why stack overflow here?
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: Any way to use fortran90 module in C?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Have you ever considered of mousing ambidextrously?
  • From: Michael Wild
• Statement functions
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Photran debug
  • From: Jim McDonald
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Have you ever considered of mousing ambidextrously?
  • From: WangQiang
• Re: What's the purpose of explicit interfaces? (Pun intended?)
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: finding the type name of a variable in fortran
  • From: Michael Wild
• Re: Any way to use fortran90 module in C?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Variable length/precision formats?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Illegal internal write?
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: Any way to use fortran90 module in C?
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: Coding guidelines question
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: Variable length/precision formats?
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: Mac Fortran Programs
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: What's the purpose of explicit interfaces? (Pun intended?)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: What's the purpose of explicit interfaces?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: What's the purpose of explicit interfaces? (Pun intended?)
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: What's the purpose of explicit interfaces?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Mac Fortran Programs
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Jim
• Mac Fortran Programs
  • From: Jim Klein
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: What's the purpose of explicit interfaces?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: What's the purpose of explicit interfaces?
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: kia
• Re: What's the purpose of explicit interfaces?
  • From: Erik Edelmann
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Jim
• Re: What's the purpose of explicit interfaces?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• What's the purpose of explicit interfaces?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Is this ordering procedure dangerous?
  • From: lello
• Re: entity naming conventions
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: entity naming conventions
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Photran 3.0.0
  • From: Walter
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: short question concerning SIZE
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Photran debug
  • From: Walter
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: William Asher
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: William Asher
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: William Asher
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: William Asher
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: William Asher
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: entity naming conventions
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: entity naming conventions
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Do compilers recognize branching within fast loops
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: Jim
• Anyone for help with DEC (Vax) Fortran-IV ?
  • From: transnet
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: kia
• Re: generalized WHILE() extension/feature?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: entity naming conventions
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: include files and long fixed form lines
  • From: James Giles
• Re: entity naming conventions
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: entity naming conventions
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: entity naming conventions
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: generating a random permutation
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Data alignment and performance
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: entity naming conventions
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Data alignment and performance
  • From: Joe Krahn
• entity naming conventions
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: generating a random permutation
  • From: ttw
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: David Frank
• finding the type name of a variable in fortran
  • From: arthur
• Re: a system_clock that doesn't roll
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Error when compiling with FTN95
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Error when compiling with FTN95
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: a system_clock that doesn't roll
  • From: Joost
• Re: a system_clock that doesn't roll
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Data alignment and performance
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: include files and long fixed form lines
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Error when compiling with FTN95
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Data alignment and performance
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Data alignment and performance
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: include files and long fixed form lines
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Data alignment and performance
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: include files and long fixed form lines
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: Michael Wild
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: short question concerning SIZE
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: David Frank
• Re: short question concerning SIZE
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Translate Fortran to Java
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Data alignment and performance
  • From: Joost
• Re: Data alignment and performance
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: Joost
• Re: Error when compiling with FTN95
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: short question concerning SIZE
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Formatted IO of huge/tiny values
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Error when compiling with FTN95
  • From: Joost
• Re: Error when compiling with FTN95
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Is this ordering procedure dangerous?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Data alignment and performance
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Returning pointers to objects that a