Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
- From: Dmitry Gorbatovsky <fincomus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:53:46 +0200
robin wrote:
DVG wrote in message ...
It is generally impossible to
beat decent Fortran numerical
procedure in performance.
It's easy in assembler language.
Most of the contemporary Fortran translators
implies good deal of optimization.
Hardly if ever achievable by human on sufficient
amount of code.
Cheers
--
*It is easy to lie with statistics, but it's a lot easier to lie without
them.
.
- References:
- Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
- From: Kobe
- Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
- From: DVG
- Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
- From: robin
- Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
- Prev by Date: Re: I searches: FORTRAN-66 (Fortran-IV) for DOS,IBM PC
- Next by Date: Re: lahey lf95: option to use integer as logical?
- Previous by thread: Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
- Next by thread: Re: Fortran vs C++ for scientific computing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|