Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Charles Russell <SPAMworFREEwor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:00:49 -0600
Charles Russell wrote:
Charles Russell wrote:
Richard E Maine wrote:Things could be
Compile your code and put it in a library the same way you do now. Then
make a module with nothing but interface blocks.
automated, but I'm not a makefile guru.
On second thought, this might be pretty simple. List the subroutines in one makefile macro and the functions in another, cat each set, change all end statements in each set using sed, cat the two together and INCLUDE the resulting file. Make all library files prerequisites.
Having done that, am I likely to hit other problems related to f77 syntax or format? As you can tell, I am not ready to cross this bridge, only to reconnoitre.
This was a bit out of context. It refers to the "end subroutine" syntax problem, not to the use of explicit interfaces.
.
- References:
- Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Walter Spector
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Charles Russell
- Structure of large link libraries in f95
- Prev by Date: Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- Next by Date: Re: O/T: Patenting a computational scheme?
- Previous by thread: Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- Next by thread: Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|