Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Maine)
- Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 14:36:12 -0800
Gary L. Scott <garyscott@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I guess by definition, subroutine/function source code in the same file
as and compiled together with the main are actually "external". I would
have thought that that should be sufficient to consider them "internal".
No contains statement should be required (oops there's that file scope
thingy again).
Not only doesn't the Fortran standard have file scope, it doesn't even
have the concept of a source file at all. The source code is just a
sequence of lines.
--
Richard Maine | Good judgement comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Gary L. Scott
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- References:
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Gary L. Scott
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- From: Gary L. Scott
- Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- Prev by Date: Re: ANN: Free Fortran Tools with F on AMD64
- Next by Date: Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- Previous by thread: Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- Next by thread: Re: Structure of large link libraries in f95
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|