Re: Writing sequential raw binary
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen <jvorbrueggen-not@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:27:27 +0200
You've already been pointed to the f03 "stream" syntax or its non-standard
predecessors. Note that all you need is to isolate/modify the OPEN statement;
the actual I/O statements remain unchanged.
As a temporary alternative, all high-quality compilers (hah! that's a defini-
tion of high quality 8-)) have a compile- or run-time switch to tell the RTL
that unformatted files should not have record delimiters/length counts. That
will also give you the behaviour you seek.
Jan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Writing sequential raw binary
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Writing sequential raw binary
- References:
- Writing sequential raw binary
- From: Joe Krahn
- Writing sequential raw binary
- Prev by Date: Re: do_ud: end of file
- Next by Date: Re: Fortran I/O system (was: do_ud: end of file)
- Previous by thread: Re: Writing sequential raw binary
- Next by thread: Re: Writing sequential raw binary
- Index(es):