Re: New style DO syntax?

Joe Krahn wrote:
My main point is that DO is an odd-ball compared to
all the other block constructs.

In which case, how about moving other DO-related elements to other
constructs? EXIT seems easy enough to carry over. Perhaps CYCLE could
be given a use in some array-based version of IF's and SELECT's. But
perhaps this would become ambiguous and there would be a need for
EXITDO and EXITIF (of course with labels) etc.


.