Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: "James Giles" <jamesgiles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:26:22 GMT
*** Hendrickson wrote:
[...] It's got complete syntax and has been passed on to
the integration phase for F3008, so it should happen.
That's an awfully long time to wait though. I didn't
think the committee had that kind of time horizon. :-)
--
J. Giles
"I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software
design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously
no deficiencies and the other way is to make it so complicated
that there are no obvious deficiencies." -- C. A. R. Hoare
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- References:
- New style DO syntax?
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Ken Plotkin
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: David Jones
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: *** Hendrickson
- New style DO syntax?
- Prev by Date: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Next by Date: Re: "GOTO considered harmful" considered harmful. Re: New style DO syntax?
- Previous by thread: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Next by thread: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Index(es):