Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Dan Nagle <dannagle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:00:45 GMT
Hello,
James Giles wrote:
*** Hendrickson wrote:[...] It's got complete syntax and has been passed on to
the integration phase for F3008, so it should happen.
That's an awfully long time to wait though. I didn't
think the committee had that kind of time horizon. :-)
The schedules are imposed by ISO. SC22 has complained,
we'll have to wait and see what happens.
--
Cheers!
Dan Nagle
Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: James Giles
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- References:
- New style DO syntax?
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Ken Plotkin
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: David Jones
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: James Giles
- New style DO syntax?
- Prev by Date: Re: "GOTO considered harmful" considered harmful. Re: New style DO syntax?
- Next by Date: Re: Newbie making a dumb mistake but can you help?
- Previous by thread: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Next by thread: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Index(es):