Re: Writing sequential raw binary
- From: Clive Page <junk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:20:20 +0100
In message <44469593.A4BF777D@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kevin G. Rhoads <kgrhoads@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
A better hack is to use unformatted, direct with record length=1, but that isn't available on
all platforms. Writing as character may invoke data transformation by the RTL, such as filtering
out "control" characters.
The g95 compiler already implements the Fortran-2003 stream I/O facilities, as described in
http://www.star.le.ac.uk/~cgp/streamIO.html
and several other compilers implement nearly the same thing, as noted in a section near the bottom of that note.
--
Clive Page
.
- References:
- Writing sequential raw binary
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: Writing sequential raw binary
- From: Kevin G. Rhoads
- Writing sequential raw binary
- Prev by Date: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Next by Date: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Previous by thread: Re: Writing sequential raw binary
- Next by thread: Re: Writing sequential raw binary
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|