Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Dan Nagle <dannagle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:42:26 GMT
Hello,
James Giles wrote:
<snip>
Thank you for reinforcing my point as clearly as
you have. Other people to whom public participation
is important actively seek such participation. Not
the committee. As can be seen, quite the reverse is
true.
I'm quite clearly begging you to attend.
And why, pray tell, do you suppose I posted the J3 web site URL,
repeatedly, if not to encourage awareness and attendance?
--
Cheers!
Dan Nagle
Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: James Giles
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- References:
- New style DO syntax?
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Ken Plotkin
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: James Giles
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: James Giles
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: James Giles
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: James Giles
- New style DO syntax?
- Prev by Date: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Next by Date: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Previous by thread: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Next by thread: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Index(es):