Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Maine)
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:50:14 -0700
James Giles <jamesgiles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*** Hendrickson wrote:
... F3008,
You mean that ISO and SC22 *also* have a time horizons that
extend to the fourth millennium? :-)
My personal opinion is that f2008 is being rushed too fast, but a delay
of 1000 years is probably more than I was thinking. :-) I do suspect
that full f2003 compilers will be out before the f2008 standard, but not
by as much as I'd like to see. It seems to me that the current schedule
allows zero opportunity for any actual experience with full-language
f2003 compilers to influence f2008. After all, the f2008 feature set
seems to be largely settled already, or at least enough so that changes
to it are likely to be resisted as being too late - but there are no
f2003 compilers yet.
--
Richard Maine | Good judgement comes from experience;
email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgement.
domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Fortran 2008 (was Re: New style DO syntax?)
- From: beliavsky
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: James Giles
- Fortran 2008 (was Re: New style DO syntax?)
- References:
- New style DO syntax?
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Ken Plotkin
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Joe Krahn
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: David Jones
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: James Giles
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: New style DO syntax?
- From: James Giles
- New style DO syntax?
- Prev by Date: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Next by Date: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Previous by thread: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Next by thread: Re: New style DO syntax?
- Index(es):