comp.lang.fortran

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortranspeak & Javaspeak
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Keith Refson
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Algorithm help for unique string searching/counting within an array.
  • From: robin
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: true 64-bit FORTRAN compilers for Windows XP 64??
  • From: Ancient_Hacker
• Re: Cannot create import libraries with Microsoft's LIB with the option mixed language Borland C++ (-ml bc) with Lahey v5.7
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: true 64-bit FORTRAN compilers for Windows XP 64??
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Fortranspeak & Javaspeak
  • From: David . Paterson
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: David Frank
• true 64-bit FORTRAN compilers for Windows XP 64??
  • From: Ancient_Hacker
• Re: Fortranspeak & Javaspeak
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: jdujic
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: jdujic
• Re: Test send
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Fortranspeak & Javaspeak
  • From: xieweibao
• Re: Fortranspeak & Javaspeak
  • From: PJH
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Beginer needing help
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: How to trace the memory use
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortranspeak & Javaspeak
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Beginer needing help
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Algorithm help for unique string searching/counting within an array.
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Algorithm help for unique string searching/counting within an array.
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Cannot create import libraries with Microsoft's LIB with the option mixed language Borland C++ (-ml bc) with Lahey v5.7
  • From: gabsata
• Fortranspeak & Javaspeak
  • From: David . Paterson
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: NaN in intel fortran 9.0 for windows integrated with VS.Net
  • From: bei
• Re: Algorithm help for unique string searching/counting within an array.
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Test send
  • From: vangcook
• Re: Beginer needing help
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Algorithm help for unique string searching/counting within an array.
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Beginer needing help
  • From: vexx
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Beginer needing help
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Algorithm help for unique string searching/counting within an array.
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Beginer needing help
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: NaN in intel fortran 9.0 for windows integrated with VS.Net
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Algorithm help for unique string searching/counting within an array.
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Beginer needing help
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Algorithm help for unique string searching/counting within an array.
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Gareth Owen
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Algorithm help for unique string searching/counting within an array.
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Algorithm help for unique string searching/counting within an array.
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Algorithm help for unique string searching/counting within an array.
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: NaN in intel fortran 9.0 for windows integrated with VS.Net
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: NaN in intel fortran 9.0 for windows integrated with VS.Net
  • From: R. MacDonald
• Re: Beginer needing help
  • From: vexx
• Re: How to trace the memory use
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• NaN in intel fortran 9.0 for windows integrated with VS.Net
  • From: bei
• Re: A better direct sparse solver for linear system with a positive definite matrix
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: A better direct sparse solver for linear system with a positive definite matrix
  • From: yuwb
• Re: A better direct sparse solver for linear system with a positive definite matrix
  • From: yuwb
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Beginer needing help
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: PJH
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: Beginer needing help
  • From: vexx
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• RE: help needed!!
  • From: meek
• RE: help needed!!
  • From: meek
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• RE: help needed!!
  • From: meek
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• RE: help needed!!
  • From: meek
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: controlling formatting of signed zeros
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: controlling formatting of signed zeros
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Lo
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Lo
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Lo
• Re: allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: controlling formatting of signed zeros
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• allocatable array *not* equivalent to dynamic allocation?
  • From: Lo
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: tessy
• Re: controlling formatting of signed zeros
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: controlling formatting of signed zeros
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: A better direct sparse solver for linear system with a positive definite matrix
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• controlling formatting of signed zeros
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: tessy
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Beginer needing help
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: tessy
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: tessy
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: tessy
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• RE: help needed!!
  • From: meek
• RE: help needed!!
  • From: meek
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Beginer needing help
  • From: vexx
• Re: help needed!!
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• help needed!!
  • From: tessy
• help needed!
  • From: tessy
• Re: A better direct sparse solver for linear system with a positive definite matrix
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: JA
• Re: How to trace the memory use
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Common statement does not work with gfortran, but g95 gives the correct answer
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Common statement does not work with gfortran, but g95 gives the correct answer
  • From: gabsata
• A better direct sparse solver for linear system with a positive definite matrix
  • From: yuwb
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• How to trace the memory use
  • From: yuwb
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Bounds Check Overhead
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• cannot link assembler code to CVF 6.6 code
  • From: William M . Grove
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: gfortran: cannot redirect output (errors and warnigns) )with > in ms-dos
  • From: FX
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: vladimir
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: jamesgiles@xxxxxxx
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: Checking for Undefined [was Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications]
  • From: AeroSpace Ed
• Re: gfortran: cannot redirect output (errors and warnigns) )with > in ms-dos
  • From: gabsata
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: HK
• Re: gfortran: cannot redirect output (errors and warnigns) )with > in ms-dos
  • From: Brooks Moses
• gfortran: cannot redirect output (errors and warnigns) )with > in ms-dos
  • From: gabsata@xxxxxxxxx
• gfortran: cannot redirect output (errors and warnigns) )with > in ms-dos
  • From: gabsata@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: HK
• Lahey/Fujitsu Linux64 Fortran v8.0
  • From: jswen
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Entropy
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: XP: cannot get hostname when mixing GNU C and GNU Fortran
  • From: John Smith
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: HK
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Compilers available for Linux
  • From: i . chivers
• Re: XP: cannot get hostname when mixing GNU C and GNU Fortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: ALLOCATABLE and POINTER subobjects
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: gfortran
  • From: Catherine Rees Lay
• Re: XP: cannot get hostname when mixing GNU C and GNU Fortran
  • From: FX
• Re: Compilers available for Linux
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: XP: cannot get hostname when mixing GNU C and GNU Fortran
  • From: Cottonwood
• Re: XP: cannot get hostname when mixing GNU C and GNU Fortran
  • From: Cottonwood
• Re: XP: cannot get hostname when mixing GNU C and GNU Fortran
  • From: FX
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Arjen Markus
• ALLOCATABLE and POINTER subobjects
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Cannot call a C module from Fortran
  • From: Cottonwood
• Re: Cannot call a C module from Fortran
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: how to create a Snapshot of subroutines or functions used in a project
  • From: Mike
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: how to create a Snapshot of subroutines or functions used in a project
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: gfortran
  • From: Ángel Gutiérrez Rodríguez
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Harold Stevens
• Re: how to create a Snapshot of subroutines or functions used in a project
  • From: Ugo
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Martin Krischik
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: how to create a Snapshot of subroutines or functions used in a project
  • From: Mike
• Re: how to create a Snapshot of subroutines or functions used in a project
  • From: Mike
• Re: New Project Recommendation - decNumber Translation to Fortran 95
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: how to create a Snapshot of subroutines or functions used in a project
  • From: Mike
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: williamdiazs
• Re: Question regarding module variables and thread safety
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Question regarding module variables and thread safety
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: New Project Recommendation - decNumber Translation to Fortran 95
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: New Project Recommendation - decNumber Translation to Fortran 95
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: New Project Recommendation - decNumber Translation to Fortran 95
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• New Project Recommendation - decNumber Translation to Fortran 95
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: how to create a Snapshot of subroutines or functions used in a project
  • From: Ugo
• Re: Question regarding module variables and thread safety
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Question regarding module variables and thread safety
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: how to create a Snapshot of subroutines or functions used in a project
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: how to create a Snapshot of subroutines or functions used in a project
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: gfortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Question regarding module variables and thread safety
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: FCC
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Question regarding module variables and thread safety
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: gfortran
  • From: FX
• Re: Shortage of Fortran Programmers
  • From: George N. White III
• Re: gfortran
  • From: Les
• Re: gfortran
  • From: beliavsky
• gfortran
  • From: Ángel Gutiérrez Rodríguez
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• how to create a Snapshot of subroutines or functions used in a project
  • From: acout
• Re: Question regarding module variables and thread safety
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: fUnit finally released
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Shortage of Fortran Programmers
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Shortage of Fortran Programmers
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Shortage of Fortran Programmers
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: IVF is a wonderful compiler (was IVF continues to disappoint(relatively))
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: IVF is a wonderful compiler (was IVF continues to disappoint(relatively))
  • From: kia
• Re: Shortage of Fortran Programmers
  • From: kia
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: kia
• Re: Shortage of Fortran Programmers
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Shortage of Fortran Programmers
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: IVF is a wonderful compiler (was IVF continues to disappoint (relatively))
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Joost
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Joost
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: hexadecimal constant syntax
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Shortage of Fortran Programmers
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: hexadecimal constant syntax
  • From: Joost
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: hexadecimal constant syntax
  • From: David Frank
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: blmblm
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: Jim
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: [ANN] fUnit finally released
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: hexadecimal constant syntax
  • From: kia
• Re: hexadecimal constant syntax
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: hexadecimal constant syntax
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: hexadecimal constant syntax
  • From: Dimitry Markman
• Re: hexadecimal constant syntax
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• hexadecimal constant syntax
  • From: Dimitry Markman
• Re: Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• 'Fortran' is the word an acronym or a portmanteau?
  • From: tomcee
• Re: Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: williamdiazs
• Re: Question regarding module variables and thread safety
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Question regarding module variables and thread safety
  • From: Norman Clerman
• Re: Question regarding module variables and thread safety
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Shortage of Fortran Programmers
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Question regarding module variables and thread safety
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: FCC
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: what does this do? UPSHIFT(I:I) = CHAR (ICHAR (STRING(I:I) ) - 40B)
  • From: diverbeard
• Re: what does this do? UPSHIFT(I:I) = CHAR (ICHAR (STRING(I:I) ) - 40B)
  • From: diverbeard
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: TYPE w/allocatable arrays
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: kus
• TYPE w/allocatable arrays
  • From: kus
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free) [a little long]
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: what does this do? UPSHIFT(I:I) = CHAR (ICHAR (STRING(I:I) ) - 40B)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: XLF Macro test for 64-bit
  • From: Dave Seaman
• XLF Macro test for 64-bit
  • From: Spinete
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Pointer problem in module
  • From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free) [a little long]
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: what does this do? UPSHIFT(I:I) = CHAR (ICHAR (STRING(I:I) ) - 40B)
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Shortage of Fortran Programmers
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Shortage of Fortran Programmers
  • From: ralphpdas
• Re: what does this do? UPSHIFT(I:I) = CHAR (ICHAR (STRING(I:I) ) - 40B)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: what does this do? UPSHIFT(I:I) = CHAR (ICHAR (STRING(I:I) ) - 40B)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free) [a little long]
  • From: Mark B Stucky
• Re: what does this do? UPSHIFT(I:I) = CHAR (ICHAR (STRING(I:I) ) - 40B)
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: what does this do? UPSHIFT(I:I) = CHAR (ICHAR (STRING(I:I) ) - 40B)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: what does this do? UPSHIFT(I:I) = CHAR (ICHAR (STRING(I:I) ) - 40B)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• what does this do? UPSHIFT(I:I) = CHAR (ICHAR (STRING(I:I) ) - 40B)
  • From: diverbeard
• Re: The field width is too small for the number of fractional digits
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: The field width is too small for the number of fractional digits
  • From: David Frank
• Re: The field width is too small for the number of fractional digits
  • From: cjk32
• Re: Proposal: STRICT :: attribute-list
  • From: James Giles
• Re: The field width is too small for the number of fractional digits
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: The field width is too small for the number of fractional digits
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: The field width is too small for the number of fractional digits
  • From: cjk32
• Re: Proposal: STRICT :: attribute-list
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: The field width is too small for the number of fractional digits
  • From: Richard E Maine
• The field width is too small for the number of fractional digits
  • From: cjk32
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Proposal: STRICT :: attribute-list
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: floating point... it still puzzles me :-)
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: floating point... it still puzzles me :-)
  • From: David Flower
• Re: floating point... it still puzzles me :-)
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: floating point... it still puzzles me :-)
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: floating point... it still puzzles me :-)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• floating point... it still puzzles me :-)
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Proposal: STRICT :: attribute-list
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free) [a little long]
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free) [a little long]
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free) [a little long]
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free) [a little long]
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free) [a little long]
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free) [a little long]
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Proposal: CHARACTER(expr, KIND = ...)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: John Harper
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: James Giles
• Proposal: CHARACTER(expr, KIND = ...)
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: James Giles
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free)
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: ben
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: James Giles
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: kia
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: ben
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Maximum size for a one dimensional array
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: James Giles
• Maximum size for a one dimensional array
  • From: av
• Maximum size for a one dimensional array
  • From: av
• Re: Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: williamdiazs
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: ejko123
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: PJH
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Tom Micevski
• Re: Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Pointers and dynamic data structures in Fortran 90/95
  • From: deltaquattro
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: PJH
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: PJH
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Proposal: INHERIT, NOINHERIT
  • From: Les
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Pointer problem in module
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free)
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• IF THEN ELSE ENDIF in expressions?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Pointer problem in module
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Proposal: INHERIT, NOINHERIT
  • From: James Giles
• Pointer problem in module
  • From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
• Re: Proposal: INHERIT, NOINHERIT
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: [ANN] fUnit finally released
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Candida Ferreira
• [ANN] fUnit finally released
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Proposal: INHERIT, NOINHERIT
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Announcement: new versions of F (free)
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Proposal: INHERIT, NOINHERIT
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Proposal: INHERIT, NOINHERIT
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Proposal: INHERIT, NOINHERIT
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Proposal: INHERIT, NOINHERIT
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Proposal: INHERIT, NOINHERIT
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: HK
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Proposal: NOEXTERNAL
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Proposal: INHERIT, NOINHERIT
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Proposal: INHERIT, NOINHERIT
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Candida Ferreira
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Candida Ferreira
• Re: Question on masked assignments
  • From: highegg
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: e p chandler
• Announcement: new versions of F (free)
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: ben
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Output format not correct
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Calls to purely Boolean logical functions
  • From: Candida Ferreira
• Re: Strange behaviour with dynamic storage
  • From: cjk32
• Re: Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: williamdiazs
• Re: Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: PJH
• Re: Strange behaviour with dynamic storage
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Help regarding fortran code
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Strange behaviour with dynamic storage
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Help regarding fortran code
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Strange behaviour with dynamic storage
  • From: cjk32
• Help regarding fortran code
  • From: av
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Question on masked assignments
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: help please!
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: help please!
  • From: simon
• Re: C interop problem
  • From: ben
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Ian Gay
• Re: Output format not correct
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Output format not correct
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Go To Statement Considered Harmful: A Retrospective
  • From: robin
• Re: Output format not correct
  • From: robin
• Re: INT in specification expression
  • From: robin
• Re: help please!
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Strange behaviour with dynamic storage
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: module problems
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Strange behaviour with dynamic storage
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: williamdiazs
• Re: Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: Tim Prince
• Fortran Code to Pascal Code
  • From: williamdiazs
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Strange behaviour with dynamic storage
  • From: cjk32
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Strange behaviour with dynamic storage
  • From: cjk32
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: help please!
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: C interop problem
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Question on masked assignments
  • From: highegg
• Re: help please!
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• C interop problem
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: help please!
  • From: simon
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: PJH
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: James Giles
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: robin
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Question on masked assignments
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: module problems
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: Question on masked assignments
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: help please!
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Question on masked assignments
  • From: John Harper
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: help please!
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: module problems
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: module problems
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: module problems
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: module problems
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: HK
• Re: module problems
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: module problems
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: module problems
  • From: highegg
• Re: module problems
  • From: Richard Maine
• module problems
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• IVF continues to disappoint (relatively)
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: help please!
  • From: simon
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: saynezya
• Re: Question on masked assignments
  • From: highegg
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Tom Micevski
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: help please!
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• help please!
  • From: zone
• Re: Question on masked assignments
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Use of IOR
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Question on masked assignments
  • From: highegg
• Use of IOR
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Help with JAPI
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: HK
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: HK
• Re: Help with JAPI
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: PJH
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Harold Stevens
• Re: Initialize parameters by external files?
  • From: Harold Stevens
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Aldebaran
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Initialize parameters by external files?
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• makefile error : photran on Windows XP
  • From: HK
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Go To Statement Considered Harmful: A Retrospective
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Initialize parameters by external files?
  • From: Harold Stevens
• Re: Initialize parameters by external files?
  • From: Harold Stevens
• Re: Go To Statement Considered Harmful: A Retrospective
  • From: Steven Correll
• Re: Initialize parameters by external files?
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Help with JAPI
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Richard E Maine
• RE: Initialize parameters by external files?
  • From: meek
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Initialize parameters by external files?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Initialize parameters by external files?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: array element (matrix) question
  • From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
• Initialize parameters by external files?
  • From: Jürgen Weithöner
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Steve Lionel
• RE: Initialize parameters by external files?
  • From: meek
• Re: F95 standard
  • From: Joost
• F95 standard
  • From: Stephen Howe
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Help with JAPI
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: array element (matrix) question
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Go To Statement Considered Harmful: A Retrospective
  • From: John Fredrickson
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Leandro
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Leandro
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: James Giles
• Re: array element (matrix) question
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: array element (matrix) question
  • From: PCAT
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: array element (matrix) question
  • From: Richard E Maine
• array element (matrix) question
  • From: PCAT
• Re: user input problem
  • From: JA
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: Ugo
• Re: Regression in io/format.c?
  • From: Andy
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: johann
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: johann
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: johann
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Leandro
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Pi
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: user input problem
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Leandro
• Re: user input problem
  • From: Joost
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Leandro
• user input problem
  • From: pieterprovoost
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Regression in io/format.c?
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: phillip . news
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: i . chivers
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: kia
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: John Appleyard
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Leandro
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Leandro
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Error in executing Fortran
  • From: Leandro
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: johann
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Help with JAPI
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: max
• Re: compat-g77 preprocessing
  • From: aoliveira
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: David Frank
• Re: compat-g77 preprocessing
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: James Giles
• compat-g77 preprocessing
  • From: aoliveira
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: Michael Prager
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: Joost
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: Joost
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: mule52
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: Joost
• Re: F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: mule52
• F90 compiler (newbie?)
  • From: mule52
• Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9.1 Now Available
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Help with JAPI
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: Help with JAPI
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: Absoft (was Re: using the same module multiple times)
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: avoiding cascading recompilation
  • From: Sean
• Re: Absoft (was Re: using the same module multiple times)
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Absoft (was Re: using the same module multiple times)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Absoft (was Re: using the same module multiple times)
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Re: Help with JAPI
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: using the same module multiple times
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Help with JAPI
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: David Frank
• Re: G95 under windows (newbie)
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Finding PID & killing processes that run for too long
  • From: feenberg
• Absoft (was Re: using the same module multiple times)
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: Joost
• speed of exe from intel 71 vs. intel 81
  • From: johann
• Re: Finding PID & killing processes that run for too long
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: avoiding cascading recompilation
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Finding PID & killing processes that run for too long
  • From: temp
• Re: Help with JAPI
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: C interop with Fortran arrays
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Go To Statement Considered Harmful: A Retrospective
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: G95 under windows (newbie)
  • From: Joost
• Re: using the same module multiple times
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Help with JAPI
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Help with JAPI
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: Go To Statement Considered Harmful: A Retrospective
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• using the same module multiple times
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: max
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: INT in specification expression
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: INT in specification expression
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: INT in specification expression
  • From: Joost
• Re: INT in specification expression
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: FYI: Fortran Library Down Temporarily
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: INT in specification expression
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: INT in specification expression
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: G95 under windows (newbie)
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: avoiding cascading recompilation
  • From: Sean
• Re: avoiding cascading recompilation
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• avoiding cascading recompilation
  • From: Sean
• Re: Go To Statement Considered Harmful: A Retrospective
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Go To Statement Considered Harmful: A Retrospective
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: C interop with Fortran arrays
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Random number production in HP Fortran 90
  • From: Robert Low
• Re: FYI: Fortran Library Down Temporarily
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Random number production in HP Fortran 90
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Random number production in HP Fortran 90
  • From: Aldebaran
• Random number production in HP Fortran 90
  • From: Robert Low
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Joost
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: DEALLOCATE of array with allocatable in a derived type
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: C interop with Fortran arrays
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: INT in specification expression
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Jamming
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: James Giles
• Re: function : question on argument for output
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• function : question on argument for output
  • From: Jamming
• INT in specification expression
  • From: FX
• Re: C interop with Fortran arrays
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: FYI: Fortran Library Down Temporarily
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: C interop with Fortran arrays
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: C interop with Fortran arrays
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Fortran/C string interop?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• C interop with Fortran arrays
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: DEALLOCATE of array with allocatable in a derived type
  • From: Joost
• Re: DEALLOCATE of array with allocatable in a derived type
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• DEALLOCATE of array with allocatable in a derived type
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Using Intel Fortran in VS.NET
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Output format not correct
  • From: Walter Rosellini
• Re: Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: vladimir
• Re: Using Intel Fortran in VS.NET
  • From: alt.comp.virus
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: David Frank
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: Band Sequential output
  • From: Bob T
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Ancient_Hacker
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Ancient_Hacker
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Using Intel Fortran in VS.NET
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Ancient_Hacker
• Re: CSHIFT and POINTER a problem?
  • From: geirive
• Re: using IMSL libraries with gfortran
  • From: nelson marques
• Using Intel Fortran in VS.NET
  • From: alt.comp.virus
• Automatic KINDs, was Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• pointer to derived type var?
  • From: Ancient_Hacker
• Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: using IMSL libraries with gfortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: using IMSL libraries with gfortran
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Character KIND conversion?
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: ben
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Craig Powers
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Leaky runtime bug or user error?
  • From: Jon
• Re: CSHIFT and POINTER a problem?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: CSHIFT and POINTER a problem?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: CSHIFT and POINTER a problem?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: CSHIFT and POINTER a problem?
  • From: highegg
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• CSHIFT and POINTER a problem?
  • From: geirive
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: Intel Fortran calling convention and MKL on Windows confusion
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Bil Kleb
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: highegg
• Re: Intel Fortran calling convention and MKL on Windows confusion
  • From: Hanyou Chu
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: ben
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Intel Fortran calling convention and MKL on Windows confusion
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: New style DO syntax?)
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Intel Fortran calling convention and MKL on Windows confusion
  • From: Hanyou Chu
• Re: Macros in Compaq Visual Fortran
  • From: robert . corbett
• Data type sizes
  • From: Håkan
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: max
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: awgreynolds
• Re: script Fortran?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• script Fortran?
  • From: ben
• Re: Macros in Compaq Visual Fortran
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Data type sizes
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Derived type versus 2nd array dimension
  • From: highegg
• Re: Data type sizes
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Joost
• Re: Data type sizes
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Data type sizes
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Question about compiling IMSL on VS NET
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Macros in Compaq Visual Fortran
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Macros in Compaq Visual Fortran
  • From: Ancient_Hacker
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Derived type versus 2nd array dimension
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Derived type versus 2nd array dimension
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Data type sizes
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: New style DO syntax?)
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: New style DO syntax?)
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Derived type versus 2nd array dimension
  • From: highegg
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Derived type versus 2nd array dimension
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Initialising of allocatable character arrays in f90/f95
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Question about compiling IMSL on VS NET
  • From: Luciel
• Question about compiling IMSL on VS NET
  • From: Luciel
• Question about compiling IMSL on VS NET
  • From: Luciel
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Derived type versus 2nd array dimension
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Derived type versus 2nd array dimension
  • From: Joe Krahn
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Andy
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Joost
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: USE, ONLY question
  • From: Joost
• USE, ONLY question
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Initialising of allocatable character arrays in f90/f95
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Initialising of allocatable character arrays in f90/f95
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: allocate syntax
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Initialising of allocatable character arrays in f90/f95
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: allocate syntax
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: allocate syntax
  • From: Richard E Maine
• allocate syntax
  • From: Bernhard Enders
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Fast math with ifort (was Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures)
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Fast math with ifort (was Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures)
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Initialising of allocatable character arrays in f90/f95
  • From: aborel
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: George N. White III
• Re: Initialising of allocatable character arrays in f90/f95
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format: INCLUDE files
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: Initialising of allocatable character arrays in f90/f95
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Initialising of allocatable character arrays in f90/f95
  • From: aborel
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Output format not correct
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Output format not correct
  • From: Walter Rosellini
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: David Frank
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: David Frank
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Richard E Maine
• What Algorithims are used for IEEE Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• RE: Output format not correct
  • From: meek
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format: INCLUDE files
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: Converting fixed-to-free format: INCLUDE files
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: using IMSL libraries with gfortran
  • From: Harold Stevens
• What Algorithims are used for Mathematical and Inquiry Intrinsic Procedures
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Query regarding Semantic Analyzer
  • From: pooja . bhateja
• Re: using IMSL libraries with gfortran
  • From: George N. White III
• Band Sequential output
  • From: tripplowe
• using IMSL libraries with gfortran
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(11)