Re: F95 standard

Tom Micevski wrote:

Richard E Maine wrote:

Joost <jv244@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The official version is just scanned txt.

I would recommend the latest draft of the fortran 95 standard:

http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/97/97-007r2/pdf/97-007r2.pdf

which is very similar to the official one but text based (and thus
nicer to use). The latest standard (Fortran2003) even has convenient
links in the pdf (at least the draft, don't know about the official
one).


ISO messed up the pdf links in f2003. They have been bitched at about
it. :-(

I would say that 97-007r2 is more than "very similar" to the official
f95 standard. Since I'm the one who produced both the 97-007r2 document
and the paper document that was scanned to make what you bought, I know
exactly what the differences are. They are:


can i ask which draft is "very similar" to the fortran 2003 standard?

Speaking of which...

j3-fortran.org link for F2003:

Object not found...

The document you requested was not found on our server.


"The mission of IAIT is to deliver the computing services and support needed to
promote academic and administrative activities of RHIT."

Last updated: 05/30/02


Rose-Hulman


TSC Home

p.s. how about spiffing this web site up a little.


1. The 97-007r2 document has different page headers and footers; they
say "working draft" instead of having the ISO headers. Likewise, the
97-002 doesn't have the ISO front pages and copyright notice.

2. The 97-007r2 document has line numbers, which make it more handy to
cite exact lines.

3. As you noticed, the copy from ANSI is scanned. I wish they had
contacted me (the editor) for a pdf instead, but there is a long (and
continuing - sigh :-() history of internal communication problems in
ISO. Instead of communicating with me for a pdf, which I could have
given them, they scanned a paper copy that I had previously sent them.

The committee itself uses the 007r2 document. I suspect that several of
the committee members have never actually seen the "official" one.

As an aside, for those who might be curious about such things, the f95
standard document was produced using Adobe FrameMaker; the f2003
document was produced with LaTeX.



--

Gary Scott
mailto:garyscott@xxxxxxx

Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com

Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org
-OR-
Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html

Why are there two? God only knows.


If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows it can't be done.

-- Henry Ford
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: F95 standard
    ... I would recommend the latest draft of the fortran 95 standard: ... ISO messed up the pdf links in f2003. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • operator precedence in Fortran 2008 draft
    ... The current draft proposed standard for Fortran 2008 ... By reusing the operators in this way, the current draft ... the operator precedence chosen by standard ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Tandem C
    ... The final arbiter of what is and what is not ANSI/ISO C compliant ... is the ISO C Standard, available from ISO for a small charge ... (although there are draft copies on the web). ... details of the evolution and development of the standard itself. ...
    (comp.sys.tandem)
  • Re: F95 standard
    ... I would recommend the latest draft of the fortran 95 standard: ... ISO messed up the pdf links in f2003. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: F95 standard
    ... I would recommend the latest draft of the fortran 95 standard: ... 97-002 doesn't have the ISO front pages and copyright notice. ... contacted me for a pdf instead, but there is a long (and ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)