Re: delay was due to parallel processing
- From: "max" <none@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:23:48 GMT
"aka" <akansha.khandelwal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151512340.253873.312160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
everything was fine... the only problem was the executable was being
called as a parallel process.. and the compiler was reaching the
section of the VB code that uses the output file even before its
generation was complete from the fortran executable and giving an error
of file not found
the output file was being generated but with a delay.
So I now keep a dummy blank txt file with the same name in the
directory. Which is later on over written by the file generated from
fortran.... and it works !!!
Though I am still looking for a better way....
Any suggestions
Do a Google search for ShellAndWait.
If it doesn't turn up anything, repost & I'll post.
.
- References:
- Fortran compiled executable form visual basic
- From: akansha . khandelwal
- Re: Fortran compiled executable form visual basic
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- delay was due to parallel processing
- From: aka
- Fortran compiled executable form visual basic
- Prev by Date: Re: recl on g95 and gfortran
- Next by Date: Efficient way to pass different shaped arrays?
- Previous by thread: Re: delay was due to parallel processing
- Next by thread: Re: Fortran compiled executable form visual basic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|