Re: Fortran refactoring

Thanks for this additional caveat!

All of the codes I'm working with DO have implicit none, so I hadn't
run across this particular wrinkle.

Phillip

Richard Maine wrote:
...
All of which suggests that possibly a prior step should be to add
"implicit none" and fix up any problems that shows... which isn't a bad
idea anyway.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
    ... Dan Nagle wrote in message ... ... |ability of many older compilers, reduces the value of implicit none. ... BTW, if you can find an old comiler that compiles F2003 codes, ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: IMPLICIT NONE (F2k8+/-)
    ... |robin wrote: ... |> |> |ability of many older compilers, reduces the value of implicit none. ... |> |> BTW, if you can find an old comiler that compiles F2003 codes, ... |> |Compiles and runs on g77 without a problem. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Statement function host association
    ... >> elsewhere on host association) that you have an implicitly typed ... >> get its implicit typing from (since the implicit typing rules can be ... end subroutine inner ... Richard Maine ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)