Re: Fortran for new and old Macs on OS X

From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:39:07 GMT

Jim Klein wrote:

Do we really need to buy two products to port to both OSX G5 and OSX
Intel ?

I would expect current gfortran to run nearly as well as Intel Fortran (currently available only for 32-bit under OSX), except for its limited vectorization ability. But I don't have access to any OSX machine myself, and don't know whether you are able to use 64-bit.
.

References:
- Fortran for new and old Macs on OS X
  - From: Jim Klein

Prev by Date: Re: Fortran for new and old Macs on OS X
Next by Date: Re: closing unit=5 and unit=6 and print *
Previous by thread: Re: Fortran for new and old Macs on OS X
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: severe(163): Program Exception - floating stack check
... enddo ... when i use intel fortran compiler or gfortran in 32-bit windows,linux, ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
Re: severe(163): Program Exception - floating stack check
... when i use intel fortran compiler or gfortran in 32-bit windows,linux, ... but the program run well in 64-bit OS, windows or linux, using ifort ... there is many common data, and have a large array about 10M element, ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
Re: [SLE] Fortran 95 development system for SuSE
... gfortran is free; Intel Fortran is not. ... scientific programs, gfortran is about 10% slower in ... execution than Intel Fortran. ...
(SuSE)
Re: [SLE] Fortran 95 development system for SuSE
... I use both GNU/gfortran and Intel Fortran for 64-bit development on SuSE 10.0. ... On large-scale scientific programs, gfortran is about 10% slower in execution than Intel Fortran. ...
(SuSE)