Re: Apology to comp.lang.fortran
- From: Dieter Britz <britz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:59:41 +0200
Richard Maine wrote:
Gib Bogle <bogle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim Klein wrote:
I still feel kind of dumb in retrospect.
Join the club.
Whatever I might have felt about the initial outburst, recognizing and
apologizing for one's transgressions goes a *LONG* way towards
atonement. There being none of us without error, etc.
How true. However, there is a rule I apply to myself on ngs.
I have caught myself writing incendiary stuff (not on this ng)
in the heat of the moment, and started a rule: after writing
a text and correcting it, I read it again and if it's a bit
personal, I ask myself, do I really want other people to
read this? If not, I wipe it and forget about it. This has
saved me from some embarrassment.
Just to supply a bit of balance, by the way: I use Intel
Fortran 90/95 under Linux, and am 100% happy with it. Never
a problem yet, over several years of use; and I program
almost daily. I am grateful to Intel for this service.
--
Dieter Britz, Kemisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apology to comp.lang.fortran
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Apology to comp.lang.fortran
- References:
- Apology to comp.lang.fortran
- From: Jim Klein
- Re: Apology to comp.lang.fortran
- From: Lane Straatman
- Re: Apology to comp.lang.fortran
- From: Jim Klein
- Re: Apology to comp.lang.fortran
- From: Gib Bogle
- Re: Apology to comp.lang.fortran
- From: Richard Maine
- Apology to comp.lang.fortran
- Prev by Date: watch variable in debugger of CVF6.6C
- Next by Date: sort the variables shown in variable window in debugger
- Previous by thread: Re: Apology to comp.lang.fortran
- Next by thread: Re: Apology to comp.lang.fortran
- Index(es):