Re: Allocatables in derived types and functions

Arno wrote:

BTW. If I encounter something peculiar with the compiler, is there any
way to communicate that directly to intel, rather than through this
news group? Mind that I am a mere user and have no rights with respect
to installing etc.; that is the job of our system administrators.

Sure. The approach I'd recommend is to apply for an evaluation copy of
the compiler at
http://www3.intel.com/cd/software/products/asmo-na/eng/compilers
Register the serial number and check the box to register for support.
This will give you access to Intel Premier Support and you can file
issues directlty. You don't even have to install the evaluation
compiler - just register. Please understand that once your evaluation
period expires, your submissions will have lower priority, but we
encourage you to let us know of problems you find.

Steve Lionel
Developer Products Division
Intel Corporation
Nashua, NH

User communities for Intel Software Development Products
http://softwareforums.intel.com/
Intel Fortran Support
http://developer.intel.com/software/products/support/
My Fortran blog
http://www.intel.com/software/drfortran

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Intel introduces "Core 2 Duo"
    ... When AMD runs at 2GHz, then *YES* 533 MHz is very measly. ... compensate for the loss of clock cycles from haveing to communicate through ... the L2 as opposed to direct communications. ... AMD has it all over Intel here. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips)
  • Re: Dell vs. eMachines T6420
    ... I still maintain that Intel "Core Duo" chips are multicore, ... Allowing communication across the L2 cache limits the use ... Intel itself has admitted several things about its "Core Duo" philosophy: ... cannot see or communicate with each other...Intel itself admits it does ...
    (alt.sys.pc-clone.dell)
  • Re: Intel introduces "Core 2 Duo"
    ... When AMD runs at 2GHz, then *YES* 533 MHz is very measly. ... cache, taking the L2 cache away from doing its real job, has no ... But it is still relatively inefficient and adding more cache does not compensate for the loss of clock cycles from haveing to communicate through the L2 as opposed to direct communications. ... I have always posted that I will acknowledge it is Intel gains the lead. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips)
  • Re: Dell vs. eMachines T6420
    ... logos, its reluctance to manufacture a true consumer level dual core processor (all Intel core duo processors are multi-core, the two cores cannot see or communicate with each other...Intel itself admits it does this because it is easier to manufacture and costs less). ... Making such a similar statement and suggesting that Intel ...
    (alt.sys.pc-clone.dell)