Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- From: Walter Spector <w6ws_xthisoutx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:27:53 GMT
Walter Spector wrote:
...
The array declaration statement you quote looks odd to me if it is supposed
to be an example of "new" Fortran - the REAL*8 is legal but not recommended
syntax...
READ*8 is non-standard.
I meant REAL*8.
W.
.
- References:
- defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- From: Ancient_Hacker
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- From: PJH
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- From: Walter Spector
- defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Prev by Date: Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Next by Date: Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Previous by thread: Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Next by thread: Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Index(es):