Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- From: "Ancient_Hacker" <grg2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Nov 2006 11:20:50 -0800
Walter Spector wrote:
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dbl_k = KIND (1.0d0) ! Double precision kind
REAL(dbl_k), ALLOCATABLE, DIMENSION(:,:) :: TwoDimmer
Whew! That's a little roundabout, but certainly better than my
ancient recourse to the old (IBMish?) REAL * 8. Of course we never used
that on the CDC's which didnt have bytes and single precision was quite
adequate.
Overall I have no major problems with the new Fortrans. Just a bit
surprised that this one particular type feature hasnt been embraced yet.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- From: Walter Spector
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- References:
- defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- From: Ancient_Hacker
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- From: Walter Spector
- defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Prev by Date: Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Next by Date: Re: random numbers in fortran
- Previous by thread: Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Next by thread: Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Index(es):