comp.lang.fortran
- Re: Reading data
- Re: Reading data
- Re: allocation error
- Re: Reading data
- Re: Reading data
- Re: Reading data
- Re: Disappointed with Intel
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: allocation error
- Re: Reading data
- Reading data
- Re: generating win32 exe on linux platform
- From: Jean Baptiste Faure
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel
- Re: allocation error
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: allocation error
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Is there any problem with the following program?
- Re: Is there any problem with the following program?
- Re: Is there any problem with the following program?
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Is there any problem with the following program?
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: allocation error
- Disappointed with Intel
- Re: allocation error
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: allocation error
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: How to transfer a file in an array
- Re: allocation error
- Re: allocation error
- Re: allocation error
- Re: allocation error
- Re: allocation error
- Re: allocation error
- allocation error
- Re: flop counter
- Re: dummy argument assumed-size
- Re: dummy argument assumed-size
- flop counter
- Re: dummy argument assumed-size
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: Problem with my split routine I am not understanding
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: How to transfer a file in an array
- Re: Problem with my split routine I am not understanding
- How to transfer a file in an array
- Re: How to transfer a file in an array
- Re: Problem with my split routine I am not understanding
- Re: Problem with my split routine I am not understanding
- Re: Problem with my split routine I am not understanding
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Problem with my split routine I am not understanding
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: dummy argument assumed-size
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: F2003: pass disallowed for procedure pointer components?
- Re: dummy argument assumed-size
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: internal I/O to substring
- F2003: pass disallowed for procedure pointer components?
- Re: Dimension attribute based on host-associated variable - bug in Intel Fortran
- Re: Dimension attribute based on host-associated variable - bug in Intel Fortran
- Re: Dimension attribute based on host-associated variable - bug in Intel Fortran
- Re: Dimension attribute based on host-associated variable - bug in Intel Fortran
- Re: Write A, left justified, howto?
- Re: Write A, left justified, howto?
- Re: Dimension attribute based on host-associated variable - bug in Intel Fortran
- Re: Dimension attribute based on host-associated variable - bug in Intel Fortran
- Re: Write A, left justified, howto?
- Write A, left justified, howto?
- Re: General Subroutine Error
- General Subroutine Error
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Dimension attribute based on host-associated variable - bug in Intel Fortran
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: Okular-Infos -
- From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
- Okular-Infos
- From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: Proper way to return a string
- Re: READ and delimited format
- Proper way to return a string
- Re: Converting string to Integer, Real, etc...
- Re: READ and delimited format
- Re: READ and delimited format
- Re: Converting string to Integer, Real, etc...
- Re: Converting string to Integer, Real, etc...
- Re: Converting string to Integer, Real, etc...
- Re: Converting string to Integer, Real, etc...
- Re: READ and delimited format
- Converting string to Integer, Real, etc...
- READ and delimited format
- Re: printing in fortran
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: (very) slow recursive function
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: (very) slow recursive function
- Re: book to obviate a grab bag of forum questions
- book to obviate a grab bag of forum questions
- Re: the efficiency of STRUCTURE on SGI IRIX
- Re: the efficiency of STRUCTURE on SGI IRIX
- Re: the efficiency of STRUCTURE on SGI IRIX
- Re: the efficiency of STRUCTURE on SGI IRIX
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: the efficiency of STRUCTURE on SGI IRIX
- Re: the efficiency of STRUCTURE on SGI IRIX
- Re: the efficiency of STRUCTURE on SGI IRIX
- Re: the efficiency of STRUCTURE on SGI IRIX
- the efficiency of STRUCTURE on SGI IRIX
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: "Bad DLL calling convention" error
- Re: "Bad DLL calling convention" error
- "Bad DLL calling convention" error
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: internal I/O to substring
- Re: generating win32 exe on linux platform
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: generating win32 exe on linux platform
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available (new URL)
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: gfortran Google Group
- Re: gfortran Google Group
- gfortran Google Group
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: generating win32 exe on linux platform
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: internal I/O to substring
- generating win32 exe on linux platform
- From: Jean Baptiste Faure
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Bit Concatenation
- Bit Concatenation
- internal I/O to substring
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: include file problem
- Re: include file problem
- include file problem
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available (new URL)
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available (new URL)
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available (new URL)
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available (new URL)
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: one element in the inverse matrix
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- one element in the inverse matrix
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: dummy argument assumed-size
- Re: dummy argument assumed-size
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- dummy argument assumed-size
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- Re: OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: a compiler bug?
- Machine/Compiler Independent Results
- Procedure Argument/External
- Re: a compiler bug?
- OT: Disappointed with Intel and Polyhedron
- Re: a compiler bug?
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: a compiler bug?
- Re: a compiler bug?
- a compiler bug?
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- Re: Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- Re: Object oriented programming in Fortran 95
- Sun Studio Express 3 compilers available for download
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: f2003 - abstract types and abstract interfaces
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- Re: f2003 - abstract types and abstract interfaces
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- Re: F2003: creating polymorphic entities
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- Re: F2003: creating polymorphic entities
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- Re: F2003: creating polymorphic entities
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- Re: SEQUENCE
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- Re: Save statement
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- F2003: creating polymorphic entities
- Re: Object oriented programming in Fortran 95
- Re: LEN_TRIM performance issue
- Re: SEQUENCE
- Re: f2003 - abstract types and abstract interfaces
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- Fortran Programmers Club
- Re: Object oriented programming in Fortran 95
- Re: Performance trouble
- LEN_TRIM performance issue
- Re: avoiding writing an interface blocks
- [OT] Fortran Forum new issue
- Re: SEQUENCE
- Re: SEQUENCE
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- Re: SEQUENCE
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: SEQUENCE
- avoiding writing an interface blocks
- From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
- Re: SEQUENCE
- Re: SEQUENCE
- Re: Is there an Eclipse plug-in for gfortran or g95 under cygwin?
- Is there an Eclipse plug-in for gfortran or g95 under cygwin?
- Re: SEQUENCE
- Re: SEQUENCE
- Re: Performance trouble
- Re: SEQUENCE
- Re: SEQUENCE
- Re: Fortran UUID Generator
- SEQUENCE
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- Re: herding global vars to a module
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Two simple questions
- Re: Performance trouble
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: cputime
- Re: cputime
- Re: Performance trouble
- Re: Installing g95
- Re: Performance trouble
- Re: Object oriented programming in Fortran 95
- Re: cputime
- cputime
- Performance trouble
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- Object oriented programming in Fortran 95
- Re: f2003 - abstract types and abstract interfaces
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Save statement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- f2003 - abstract types and abstract interfaces
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: allocated array
- Re: Fortran UUID Generator
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: PGI Visual Fortran
- Re: Save statement
- Re: allocated array
- Re: basic Fortran info
- Re: basic Fortran info
- Re: Save statement
- basic Fortran info
- Re: Fortran UUID Generator
- Re: Save statement
- Re: Fortran UUID Generator
- Re: Fortran UUID Generator
- Re: Fortran UUID Generator
- Re: Save statement
- Re: Save statement
- Re: Save statement
- Fortran UUID Generator
- Re: Save statement
- Re: Save statement
- Re: allocated array
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: Two simple questions
- Re: allocated array
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- Re: Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: herding global vars to a module
- Generics with alternate-return arguments?
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: herding global vars to a module
- Re: herding global vars to a module
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Two simple questions
- Re: herding global vars to a module
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: herding global vars to a module
- Re: Two simple questions
- Re: allocated array
- herding global vars to a module
- Two simple questions
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: allocated array
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: allocated array
- Re: allocated array
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: fortran give false value !!!
- Re: check monotony of array values
- Re: allocated array
- Re: A problem with READ statement.
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: printing in fortran
- Re: how NOT to program in FORTRAN
- Re: f90
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Derived type - valued function with pointer member.
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: Derived type - valued function with pointer member.
- Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: Derived type - valued function with pointer member.
- Re: Save statement
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: allocated array
- Re: Save statement
- RE: Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: allocated array
- Re: allocated array
- Re: Derived type - valued function with pointer member.
- Re: Derived type - valued function with pointer member.
- Re: F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- Re: Derived type - valued function with pointer member.
- Getting the decimal points to line up!
- Re: allocated array
- Re: allocated array
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: allocated array
- Re: Save statement
- Re: Installing g95
- Re: Derived type - valued function with pointer member.
- Re: Derived type - valued function with pointer member.
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: allocated array
- Re: Derived type - valued function with pointer member.
- Re: Derived type - valued function with pointer member.
- Re: allocated array
- Derived type - valued function with pointer member.
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: Save statement
- Re: F2003
- Re: F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- Re: allocated array
- Re: allocated array
- Re: Save statement
- Re: allocated array
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: allocated array
- Re: allocated array
- Re: allocated array
- Re: allocated array
- Re: allocated array
- allocated array
- Re: Save statement
- Re: threaded avl trees?!
- Re: how NOT to program in FORTRAN
- Re: F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- Re: IVF and DLLs
- IVF and DLLs
- Re: F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- Re: Save statement
- Re: F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- Re: F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- RE: how NOT to program in FORTRAN
- Re: F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- Re: F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- Re: F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- Re: threaded avl trees?!
- Re: F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- Re: Save statement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- F2K C Interoperability - SIZEOF
- Re: Save statement
- Re: Save statement
- Re: Save statement
- Re: Save statement
- Re: how NOT to program in FORTRAN
- Re: Save statement
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Save statement
- how NOT to program in FORTRAN
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: fortran give false value !!!
- Re: F2003
- Re: threaded avl trees?!
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: How to deal with a file with binary and formatted blocks at once ?
- Re: Stack overflow with structured array, why?
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: Stack overflow with structured array, why?
- Re: threaded avl trees?!
- Re: F2003
- Re: F2003
- Re: threaded avl trees?!
- Re: Stack overflow with structured array, why?
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- Re: writing in array
- Re: writing in array
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: writing in array
- Re: writing in array
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: writing in array
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: Installing g95
- Re: Installing g95
- Re: printing in fortran
- Re: Installing g95
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: Power Term serveur...
- From: rjkematick@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: Installing g95
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Installing g95
- Re: Stack overflow with structured array, why?
- Re: Stack overflow with structured array, why?
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Stack overflow with structured array, why?
- Re: Power Term serveur...
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: F2003
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- F2003
- Re: Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: writing in array
- Allocation interoperability (Fortran/C)
- Re: writing in array
- Re: writing in array
- Re: writing in array
- Re: Power Term serveur...
- Re: writing in array
- Re: writing in array
- Re: writing in array
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: writing in array
- Re: writing in array
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: Power Term serveur...
- writing in array
- Re: Power Term serveur...
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- From: Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: code critique wanted
- Power Term serveur...
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- RE: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: index value after FORALL
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: f90
- f90
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: index value after FORALL
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: code critique wanted
- Printing large arrays in Fortran
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: code critique wanted
- Re: code critique wanted
- code critique wanted
- Re: index value after FORALL
- Re: Variable name with different font size
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: threaded avl trees?!
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- threaded avl trees?!
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: index value after FORALL
- Re: index value after FORALL
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: index value after FORALL
- Re: index value after FORALL
- Re: index value after FORALL
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: index value after FORALL
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: index value after FORALL
- Re: index value after FORALL
- Re: PGI Visual Fortran
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: index value after FORALL
- Re: Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: PGI Visual Fortran
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: PGI Visual Fortran
- Re: PGI Visual Fortran
- Re: index value after FORALL
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: index value after FORALL
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- index value after FORALL
- Re: [ANN] PGI Visual Fortran
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Knuth: Linear Congruential Method
- Re: Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Aargh - can't get makefile to work in gfortran under WindowsXP
- Re: check monotony of array values
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: printing in fortran
- Re: fortran give false value !!!
- Re: fortran give false value !!!
- Re: fortran give false value !!!
- Re: fortran give false value !!!
- Re: fortran give false value !!!
- Re: fortran give false value !!!
- fortran give false value !!!
- Re: Computing zero set of function of two variables
- Re: check monotony of array values
- Re: check monotony of array values
- Re: How to deal with a file with binary and formatted blocks at once ?
- How to deal with a file with binary and formatted blocks at once ?
- Real-Time program terminate faults
- Re: check monotony of array values
- Re: check monotony of array values
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Computing zero set of function of two variables
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Re: check monotony of array values
- Re: Computing zero set of function of two variables
- Re: check monotony of array values
- Computing zero set of function of two variables
- Re: check monotony of array values
- RE: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- check monotony of array values
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Re: Variable name with different font size
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Re: CPU_TIME() and OpenMP
- CPU_TIME() and OpenMP
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Re: Variable name with different font size
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Variable name with different font size
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: printing in fortran
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Variable name with different font size
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Variable name with different font size
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: printing in fortran
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: printing in fortran
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: printing in fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: printing in fortran
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: printing in fortran
- Compiling Fortran in 32 bit mode
- Re: Memory usage f95...
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Memory usage f95...
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- Re: INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Memory usage f95...
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- RE: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: [OT] random numbers in fortran
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- INQUIRE - FORM vs. (UN)FORMATTED
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- Re: printing in fortran
- Re: printing in fortran
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- printing in fortran
- RE: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- RE: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- RE: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Fortran 2003: Procedures in assignments
- Re: Fortran 2003: Procedures in assignments
- Re: Fortran 2003: Procedures in assignments
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Fortran 2003: Procedures in assignments
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- Summary of F2003 features supported in each compiler
- Re: couple c and fortran 95
- Re: Fortran dud ...
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: generic interface and not referred ambiguous symbols
- Re: How to pad integer output with zeros
- Re: How to pad integer output with zeros
- Re: How to pad integer output with zeros
- Re: How to pad integer output with zeros
- How to pad integer output with zeros
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: Fortran dud ...
- Re: command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- command for measuring computing time in milli sec.
- From: viraginspires@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: couple c and fortran 95
- Re: couple c and fortran 95
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: generic interface and not referred ambiguous symbols
- couple c and fortran 95
- From: pradeep.bhattad@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Fortran dud ...
- From: rjkematick@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: generic interface and not referred ambiguous symbols
- Re: Fortran dud ...
- Re: Fortran dud ...
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Fortran dud ...
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: Fortran dud ...
- From: rjkematick@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: generic interface and not referred ambiguous symbols
- Re: Fortran dud ...
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: generic interface and not referred ambiguous symbols
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Re: Fortran dud ...
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: Fortran dud ...
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Re: Fortran dud ...
- Can Java program evoke and run a FORTRAN program directly?
- Fortran dud ...
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: A problem with READ statement.
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: gfortran install on PCC OSX
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Fortran for old Computer Automation mini-computers
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Re: Fortran books
- Re: Fortran books
- Re: Fortran books
- Re: Fortran books
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: Fortran books
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: Fortran books
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Fortran books (was Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?)
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Re: gfortran install on PCC OSX
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Re: Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Using the same subroutine to read files with different structures
- Re: gfortran install on PCC OSX
- Re: gfortran install on PCC OSX
- Re: gfortran install on PCC OSX
- gfortran install on PCC OSX
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- Re: A problem with READ statement.
- Re: A problem with READ statement.
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: locating freeware subroutines (Netlib, GAMS, etc)
- Re: Question concerning submodules
- Re: Question concerning submodules
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Question concerning submodules
- Re: convert code with Hollerith constants
- Re: convert code with Hollerith constants
- Re: convert code with Hollerith constants
- Re: convert code with Hollerith constants
- Re: convert code with Hollerith constants
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: generic interface and not referred ambiguous symbols
- convert code with Hollerith constants
- Re: subroutine argument question
- Re: subroutine argument question
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: subroutine argument question
- Re: Interface problem
- Re: subroutine argument question
- Re: subroutine argument question
- Re: Interface problem
- Re: Interface problem
- Re: subroutine argument question
- Re: Interface problem
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- subroutine argument question
- Interface problem
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: A problem with READ statement.
- Re: A problem with READ statement.
- Re: A problem with READ statement.
- Re: A problem with READ statement.
- A problem with READ statement.
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Re: generic interface and not referred ambiguous symbols
- Re: Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Re: generic interface and not referred ambiguous symbols
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- generic interface and not referred ambiguous symbols
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Fortran 90/95 code obfuscator?
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Re: How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- How popular is Fortran and what is it's future ?
- Re: A problem to read a SEG-file using Fortran90 code on PC
- Re: problem about "undefined reference to *** "
- problem about "undefined reference to *** "
- Re: A problem to read a SEG-file using Fortran90 code on PC
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: HELP : LINUX TOP analysis query
- Re: HELP : LINUX TOP analysis query
- HELP : LINUX TOP analysis query
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- Re: A problem to read a SEG-file using Fortran90 code on PC
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- gfortran uses four-byte record markers by default
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: A problem to read a SEG-file using Fortran90 code on PC
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Problems with big modules of subroutines
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Sparse matrix assmbly Finite Volumes
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Sparse matrix assmbly Finite Volumes
- Re: debug error 'AFTER NORMAL BLOCK'
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: A problem to read a SEG-file using Fortran90 code on PC
- A problem to read a SEG-file using Fortran90 code on PC
- Re: debug error 'AFTER NORMAL BLOCK'
- Re: functions returning (pointer to) subroutine?
- debug error 'AFTER NORMAL BLOCK'
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: format questions
- format questions
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: functions returning (pointer to) subroutine?
- functions returning (pointer to) subroutine?
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- RE: Popularity contests
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: using optional arguments not present (bug)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- using optional arguments not present (bug)
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: Sparse matrix assmbly Finite Volumes
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Can I do this in Fortran?
- Re: Can I do this in Fortran?
- Re: Can I do this in Fortran?
- Re: Sparse matrix assmbly Finite Volumes
- Re: Popularity contests
- Re: Can I do this in Fortran?
- Can I do this in Fortran?
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: A problem in writting a sequential binary file (compiled with LF95)
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Popularity contests
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Sparse matrix assmbly Finite Volumes
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: Reading Multiple files in fortran
- Re: locating freeware subroutines (Netlib, GAMS, etc)
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: Reading Multiple files in fortran
- Reading Multiple files in fortran
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: locating freeware subroutines (Netlib, GAMS, etc)
- Re: locating freeware subroutines (Netlib, GAMS, etc)
- Re: locating freeware subroutines (Netlib, GAMS, etc)
- Re: locating freeware subroutines (Netlib, GAMS, etc)
- Re: locating freeware subroutines (Netlib, GAMS, etc)
- Re: How to assign a=b=c=2 in fortran in one statement
- Re: What does /= do?
- Re: What does /= do?
- Re: locating freeware subroutines (Netlib, GAMS, etc)
- Re: What does /= do?
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: What does /= do?
- Re: What does /= do?
- locating freeware subroutines (Netlib, GAMS, etc)
- Re: What does /= do?
- Re: What does /= do?
- Re: What does /= do?
- What does /= do?
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: (OT) random numbers in fortran
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Cray binary format
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Re: defining an arbitrary type in your newer Fortrans
- Re: random numbers in fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- RE: rounding a number
- RE: Cray binary format
- RE: Pet hates
- RE: integer to character?
- RE: too long function
