Tim Prince wrote:
I would have liked to
see array syntax conversion as an option in a cleanup utility, but this
is not a popular position, not enough for anyone to work on it, nor for
77to90 to sell at the price which was asked for it.
No one had to work on it. They already had the 77to90 that supposedly
worked. They just had to continue selling it which I don't see why they
stopped (unless there were some bugs which could change the logic?).
BTW, they could lower the price and still make profit if it were indeed
a mature software.
- Prev by Date: Re: Examples of FORALL and nested FORALL
- Next by Date: Re: Multithreading on Multicore Processors
- Previous by thread: Re: VAST/77to90
- Next by thread: writing step by step