Re: What is going on with Lahey?
- From: Herman D. Knoble <SkipKnobleLESS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:41:18 -0500
Al: Please post a short run-time example that IVF catches but LF95 v5.7 or 7.1
does not catch.
Skip Knoble
On 31 Jan 2007 05:57:17 -0800, awgreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
-|According to one of their representatives that I communicated with
-|recently, Lahey is getting out of the Windows compiler business.
-|
-|As for runtime checking, I have found that IVF 9.1 is faster and more
-|thorough than Lahey 7.1 on Windows. Maybe Lahey's Linux 8.0 has made
-|improvements in this area and leapfrogged over IVF.
-|
-|Al Greynolds
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is going on with Lahey?
- From: awgreynolds
- Re: What is going on with Lahey?
- References:
- What is going on with Lahey?
- From: nobat
- Re: What is going on with Lahey?
- From: John Fredrickson
- Re: What is going on with Lahey?
- From: nobat
- Re: What is going on with Lahey?
- From: dpb
- Re: What is going on with Lahey?
- From: Herman D . Knoble
- Re: What is going on with Lahey?
- From: awgreynolds
- What is going on with Lahey?
- Prev by Date: Re: What is going on with Lahey?
- Next by Date: Re: Declaration to get 8-bit (or 16-bit) integer?
- Previous by thread: Re: What is going on with Lahey?
- Next by thread: Re: What is going on with Lahey?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|