Re: CVF and Vista
- From: Paul van Delst <Paul.vanDelst@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:48:45 -0500
Steve Lionel wrote:
On Jan 30, 8:51 pm, sureal <sur...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
According to CNET Vista is just a warmed over XP, so CVF should work
just fine, except for an unknown number of service packs until MS cleans
up the bugs.
Whoever wrote that is clueless.
One significant change in Vista is that the registry is locked down so
that, by default, applications cannot modify most registry entries,
even if the user has administrator privileges. Visual Studio depends
on making such changes and is not happy if it cannot. Apparently, VS6
(used by CVF) simply falls over if it is blocked from the registry.
Even VS2005 will behave in odd ways if it can't write the registry.
I would have expected MS to fix VS 2005 so that it operated within the
limits of Vista but apparently they are saving that for the NEXT VS
(code named Orcas). All they did with their Vista compatibility
update was remove VS2005 from the list of "incompatible" applications
and add a popup warning you to run VS as administrator.
So, if I understand you (which I doubt since I know nothing about Windows at all :o), Vista basically buggers up the system (Visual Studio) upon which apps like CVF and IVF depend?
It's my experience that admin privileges (on windows, linux or mac) are generally not available to the people that actually use the computer.
cheers,
paulv
--
Paul van Delst Ride lots.
CIMSS @ NOAA/NCEP/EMC Eddy Merckx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CVF and Vista
- From: Jim
- Re: CVF and Vista
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: CVF and Vista
- References:
- CVF and Vista
- From: Michael Metcalf
- Re: CVF and Vista
- From: sureal
- Re: CVF and Vista
- From: Steve Lionel
- CVF and Vista
- Prev by Date: Re: problem with library function
- Next by Date: Re: CVF and Vista
- Previous by thread: Re: CVF and Vista
- Next by thread: Re: CVF and Vista
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|