Re: What is going on with Lahey?

My code doesn't use any new F2003 features YET.

On Jan 31, 12:07 pm, Herman D. Knoble <SkipKnobleL...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Al,

You may have been using a Fortran 2003 construct that Lahey (windows)
compiles correctly but does not detect uninitialized variables for. Example,
Derived Type Integer (or Real) array. For more complete lists see:
Table III at: http://ftp.aset.psu.edu/pub/ger/fortran/test/results.txt
and Polyhedron results at:

http://www.polyhedron.com/pb05/win32/diagnose.html

Skip

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: detect Inf or NaN
    ... On Oct 25, 6:46 pm, Herman D. Knoble ... Unforunately I cannot use F2003 features for ... portability reasons, but this should help. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Manage external functions
    ... Herman D. Knoble wrote: ... Not until Fortran 2008, which means it's likely to be several years before readily available compilers allow it. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: MPI beginner
    ... On Sep 30, 1:05 pm, Herman D. Knoble ... -|It appears the first link it returned might be what you want: ... This is a nice piece of work; however it's for Fortran 77. ... Skip Knoble ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: double precision difference between matlab and fortran 90
    ... On Mar 14, 4:20 pm, Herman D. Knoble ... -|I am doing the same simple operation in matlab and fortran: ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: OT: FORTRAN
    ... needed to support a more standard version of Fortran -- and at that, ... CDC always supported all ANSI Fortran features. ... They frequently added additional features and a lot of them became standard features in the next version of the ANSI standard; ... We always ran the ANSI standard Fortran tests everytime we made an update, even a bug fix, to the Fortran compiler. ...
    (comp.lang.pl1)