Re: Integer Coersion

PJH wrote:
Someone around here is going to get hot under the collar with you for saying
that INTEGER(1) implies 1 byte, rather than INTEGER*1. I'm sure there
actully are some compilers out there that deliberately don't have a
KIND=BYTE equivalence.

G77 used INTEGER(1) to mean the default integer, INTEGER(2) as something occupying twice the space, INTEGER(5) as something occupying half the space, and INTEGER(7) as the system pointer type.

- Brooks


--
The "bmoses-nospam" address is valid; no unmunging needed.
.