Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95

From: ftb_95_user@xxxxxxxxxxx (FTN95_USER)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:04:56 GMT

I have a 100,000 line program that was wriiten to meet FTN90 standards. I have
to compile and run it on a system using FTN95. Under FTN95, the function sign
behaves differently than under FTN90. I can fix it by writing my own sign
function, but I need to know if there is a way to make FTN95 use my verson of
sign as opposed to the version built into FTN95.

- Thanks, Tom

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
  - From: Richard Maine
- Re: Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
  - From: Michael Metcalf

Prev by Date: Re: fortran 2003 compiler
Next by Date: Re: Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
Previous by thread: converting a R code to fortran
Next by thread: Re: Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: fortran
... I have found Salford's FTN95 to be more than just ... I have yet to get it to compile (let alone run correctly) ... my primary application which compiles and runs fine using IBM XLF, G95, ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
Re: How to compile XFoil with FTN95?
... personal_edition.asp) but since I don't have experience in UNIX i ... since FTN95 obviously has its' own syntax on such files. ... Maybe someone could explain to me how to correctly compile the code. ... qomputing dot demon dot co dot uk ...
(comp.lang.fortran)
Re: Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
... to compile and run it on a system using FTN95. ... behaves differently than under FTN90. ... Mike Metcalf ...
(comp.lang.fortran)