Re: Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95


"FTN95_USER" <ftb_95_user@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:YqEEh.1568$PV3.22293@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a 100,000 line program that was wriiten to meet FTN90 standards. I
have
to compile and run it on a system using FTN95. Under FTN95, the function
sign
behaves differently than under FTN90.

Well, only to the extent that your processor can distingush -0.0 from +0.0
and -0 from +0. This is a very marginal change in most cases.

I can fix it by writing my own sign
function, but I need to know if there is a way to make FTN95 use my verson
of
sign as opposed to the version built into FTN95.

One way is to use an EXTERNAL SIGN statement where needed.

Regards,

Mike Metcalf


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: fortran
    ... I have found Salford's FTN95 to be more than just ... I have yet to get it to compile (let alone run correctly) ... my primary application which compiles and runs fine using IBM XLF, G95, ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: How to compile XFoil with FTN95?
    ... personal_edition.asp) but since I don't have experience in UNIX i ... since FTN95 obviously has its' own syntax on such files. ... Maybe someone could explain to me how to correctly compile the code. ... qomputing dot demon dot co dot uk ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
    ... I have a 100,000 line program that was wriiten to meet FTN90 standards. ... to compile and run it on a system using FTN95. ... sign as opposed to the version built into FTN95. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)