Re: Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
- From: ftb_95_user@xxxxxxxxxxx (FTN95_USER)
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:09:36 GMT
I assume you must be talking about the issue of signed zeros.
If you have a 100,000-line program in f90, you should probably
be using modules anyway.
Thanks Richard and Michael. Making it an external function worked well. That
was the problem I was having. The original authors were using sign to test for
negative zeros (why, I do not know.)
I was tasked with getting it to work under FTN95 and it was blowing up on the
same data that worked under FTN90. I traced it to the sign function behaving
differently under the newer compiler.
I've been a coder for years, but hadn't played with FORTRAN again until about 6
months ago, and was rusty about how to get around this. Your help was
appreciated!
Thanks, Tom
.
- References:
- Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
- From: FTN95_USER
- Re: Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
- From: Richard Maine
- Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
- Prev by Date: Re: Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
- Next by Date: Re: Optional arguments in nested subroutines
- Previous by thread: Re: Can an intrinsic function be replaced in FTN95
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|