Re: integer*8 speed vs integer*4 speed
- From: "Steve Lionel" <steve.lionel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Feb 2007 10:07:01 -0800
On Feb 27, 11:19 am, "Lynn McGuire" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Because my current F77 compiler does not support integer*8 and
logical*8. I am trying to move to the IVF 9.1 compiler but am having
many, many problems for my mixed F66 / F77 code (mostly zero
initialization problems).
Lynn,
If you need help, you can post in our user forum or contact Intel
Premier Support. See if the options /Qsave /Qzero help you.
Steve Lionel
Developer Products Division
Intel Corporation
Nashua, NH
User communities for Intel Software Development Products
http://softwareforums.intel.com/
Intel Fortran Support
http://developer.intel.com/software/products/support/
My Fortran blog
http://www.intel.com/software/drfortran
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: integer*8 speed vs integer*4 speed
- From: Lynn McGuire
- Re: integer*8 speed vs integer*4 speed
- References:
- integer*8 speed vs integer*4 speed
- From: Lynn McGuire
- Re: integer*8 speed vs integer*4 speed
- From: Gib Bogle
- Re: integer*8 speed vs integer*4 speed
- From: Lynn McGuire
- integer*8 speed vs integer*4 speed
- Prev by Date: Re: converting a R code to fortran
- Next by Date: OpenMP: data scoping and modules
- Previous by thread: Re: integer*8 speed vs integer*4 speed
- Next by thread: Re: integer*8 speed vs integer*4 speed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|